...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-11-2013, 05:49 PM
CarlC CarlC is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 641
Thanks: 12
Thanked 112 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Low,

Thanks for coming in. Here's a flow table performed by RC Engineering for the LS3 pump at the outlet of the module. Bryan is running the complete module in the car. A bit of re-scaling is needed to adjust the BSFC accordingly.



At the same time ZL1 and CTS-V fuel modules were also flow tested. The results for the CTS-V are very similar to those obtained by Kinsler for a CTS-V fuel module, so the flow numbers should be good.

One part of the equation that may be missing in yours is the fuel draw required to drive the venturi pumps in the fuel module. If you are taking the flow readings from the outlet of the pump instead of the hat outlet then your flowrates will be higher. Did you remove the pump from the manifold housing for testing?

I was looking at your DW300 last week for a potential project. It's a heck of a pump. Very efficient and nicely packaged.
__________________
http:www.vaporworx.com

Last edited by CarlC; 07-11-2013 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-11-2013, 09:47 PM
LowFlyin' LowFlyin' is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: OKC
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
One part of the equation that may be missing in yours is the fuel draw required to drive the venturi pumps in the fuel module. If you are taking the flow readings from the outlet of the pump instead of the hat outlet then your flowrates will be higher. Did you remove the pump from the manifold housing for testing?
I had to hook the venturi part of the bucket to the LS3 pump to get a good flow reading out of the pump. With the venturi supply line disconnected and flowing free into the tank, it only supplied 150LPH @ 40psi.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-29-2013, 07:06 PM
glassman's Avatar
glassman glassman is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Livermore
Posts: 2,466
Thanks: 111
Thanked 84 Times in 62 Posts
Default

So Bryan, what was the result?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-30-2013, 08:17 AM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 17
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

The car is back together and running, and everything is working so far. I drove it last weekend and thought I was capturing data to confirm that the pressure was staying stable, but unfortunately I did something wrong and lost the data. I'll do it again this weekend.

I've noticed that it hold a precise 58 psi at idle, and when I blip the throttle, I see it drops to about 56 and stays there. Again, I need to drive and capture some data to get more exact numbers...

I'll update more soon. I just moved this week, so TOW has been sitting while everything else has been dealt with! :\
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net