...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-03-2014, 03:41 PM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 534 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Don't confuse 4 BAR or PARALLEL 4 BAR with Triangulated 4 Bar -- they are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT configurations other than they use 4 bars...
Agreed. OP is talking about installing a parallel 4 bar in his car. He was told that the triangulated four bar is too complex for a novice to install.

He wrote and I quote:
"Scott with AME said the triangulated would be a tough install for a first timer. And after I read all the Ron Sutton stuff the parallel sounds like the way to go."

Don

Last edited by dhutton; 07-03-2014 at 03:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-03-2014, 03:47 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
Agreed. OP is talking about installing a parallel 4 bar in his car. He was told that the triangulated four bar is too complex for a novice to install.

Don


Not sure -- since I didn't go back to research -- who told him that (too difficult for a novice to install)... but that's really arbitrary. There are novices that shouldn't do ANYTHING and there are guys with pretty good brains and decent skills that can do a good job at most everything they touch.


I think ol' Jarhead is up to the task.


There's plenty of folks around here that would be happy to guide him if he needs it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-03-2014, 03:52 PM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 534 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Not sure -- since I didn't go back to research -- who told him that (too difficult for a novice to install)... but that's really arbitrary. There are novices that shouldn't do ANYTHING and there are guys with pretty good brains and decent skills that can do a good job at most everything they touch.


I think ol' Jarhead is up to the task.


There's plenty of folks around here that would be happy to guide him if he needs it.
AME told him that. I have no reason to doubt that he is up to the task. I was more surprised that parallel 4 bar suspensions (aside from the Quadralink) are being recommended on this forum.

Don

Last edited by dhutton; 07-03-2014 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-03-2014, 04:05 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
AME told him that. I have no reason to doubt that he is not up to the task. I was more surprised that parallel 4 bar suspensions (aside from the Quadralink) are being recommended on this forum.

Don


Agree Don -- Parallel 4 bar is the worst suspension if a guy wants to go around a corner. This is the style I built for Rudy's pro-street Camaro. That's what he wanted. It's almost impossible to ROLL the rear suspension since the suspension just wants to go up and down in a PARALLEL motion from side to side. This stye suspension is great for big fat tires and straight lines. And it really should be called a 5 BAR -- because you need a PANHARD BAR (the 5th bar) in order to keep the rear end stable from side to side. Whereas the triangulation of a triangulated 4 bar doesn't need the Panhard bar for location.


I certainly don't see ANY reason at all for the "harder to install" comment. ZERO - NADA - ZIP.... if a guy can measure - cut - weld - understands SQUARE - PARALLEL - LEVEL etc -- They should be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-04-2014, 11:25 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Agree Don -- Parallel 4 bar is the worst suspension if a guy wants to go around a corner. This is the style I built for Rudy's pro-street Camaro. That's what he wanted. It's almost impossible to ROLL the rear suspension since the suspension just wants to go up and down in a PARALLEL motion from side to side. This stye suspension is great for big fat tires and straight lines. And it really should be called a 5 BAR -- because you need a PANHARD BAR (the 5th bar) in order to keep the rear end stable from side to side. Whereas the triangulation of a triangulated 4 bar doesn't need the Panhard bar for location.


I certainly don't see ANY reason at all for the "harder to install" comment. ZERO - NADA - ZIP.... if a guy can measure - cut - weld - understands SQUARE - PARALLEL - LEVEL etc -- They should be fine.
I agree completely Greg. We used all the individual components of the AME triangulated 4-Link in the chassis I built for the truck. Some strings, level, square, Plumb Lines etc. No problem.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net