Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb
My son initially invested in them last year. Then the local "investing expert" from his work told him that for a small investor the extra tax paperwork for that particular stock would eat up any profit. In his words it's a fine investment for a big investor, but not good for my son, so he got out of it. I always wondered if that was true.
|
KMP is a "master limited partnership" and does come with a different tax structure - in that you are a PARTNER in the truer sense of the word... and because they distribute (by law) the profits per quarter you get a K1 tax form.
Because of depreciation etc --- they really distribute your original investment back to you so it's considered a distribution of capital or --- RETURN OF CAPITAL... That way since you're just getting your own money back -- it doesn't carry an "INITIAL" tax burden... BUT when you sell ---- now you're going to have to calculate what tax - if any - is due.
So a very good point Jody --- not a point I'd consider if the shares are held in a deferred tax account (401 etc) and certainly not if held in a tax free ROTH.
My income tax form last year was 184 pages ---- so I doubt it affected the overall cost of tax prep for me... LOL ------ And I wouldn't think for the average person it would take more than 10 or 15 minutes extra if they are using a pro tax prep firm.... BUT it is a point worth thinking about I guess.
I would advise -- and always have advised -- that a quick phone call to your tax preparer BEFORE someone gets into something they don't understand -- is a smart call.
I own a small apartment complex inside Gwen's 401K --- and I did that WITHOUT asking my guy.... and it's been nothing but a headache every year... to the point of my inquiring about just buying it out of the IRA and taking the tax hit. Seems the IRS doesn't like "PASSIVE INCOME" inside a tax deferred account so has mean spirited rules to make you want to avoid doing that.
So just one last thought on this -------- MLP's issue a K1 instead of a 1099.... and for MANY YEARS -- the "dividend" isn't a dividend -- it's treated as a return of capital. So there's no tax hit for many years -- in other words --- you'd have to have owned it for so long that you've gotten dividends that equal your original investment... Once you've reached that point --- all else that comes your way would be treated as "income".