An interesting exercise on RETIREMENT INCOME investing.... I read the entire thing.... and there are GOOD THOUGHT PROCESS going on here. So it was certainly worth the read.
Here's where I take issue with it.... WAY TOO MANY NAMES for anyone to be able to follow and feel good about knowing what they own. That's me personally... If I can't tell you what I own -- remember them ALL -- and tell you WHY... Then they're not in my accounts. This is why I personally limit my stocks to about 20 names.
Here's the way I figure it. Let's say I have 200K invested - so 20 names would give me 10K in each one. That's just about right in my book. That's enough dough in each name to have it really working.. yet it's not too much dough per name if one should crap out. So if I have 20 million in stocks - why not the same thinking? A million per name - manageable to follow and check up on... but all stuff that I can feel good about. The ratio is the same. If I felt good enough about them to stick 100K in them - then why wouldn't I stick half a mill in it if I still liked it and it was working for me. Why try to make it complicated and just go out and find something else "just because"?
ANYWAY -- Here's the link to the article because I did like some of the work he's done - or rather - the way he looked at things. You never have to agree with EVERYTHING you read - it's all just learning you take away what you want and leave the rest on the table.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2017..._str_2_4&ifp=0