...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-13-2006, 12:03 PM
Damn True's Avatar
Damn True Damn True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smack_talker
I have seen on some Camaro boards that people have said its too wide and would not fit on trailers. I hope the car changes some before it sees production. I'm not crazy about the back of the car and those funky taillights.Oh yeah..get rid of the "Knight Rider" thingy on the header panel.

Trailers?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-13-2006, 01:30 PM
Smack_talker's Avatar
Smack_talker Smack_talker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 568
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damn True
Trailers?
yup...trailers. I dont know why they are worried about it fitting on a car trailer but they were. I guess they are not confident of its reliablility. Chevy guys..go figure.
__________________
R.I.P Jenna Weaver, my "Little Peanut" 01-18-07 to 01-30-07. Thank you for 13 days that I will NEVER forget.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-13-2006, 11:53 PM
Dezduster Dezduster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Deserts of Nevada
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

2006 Dodge Charger R/T HEMI
Base price: V-6 $22,295; price as tested with HEMI V-8 and Road & Track package, $31,495
Engine: 5.7-liter V-8, 340 hp/390 lb-ft; 3.5-liter V-6, 250 hp/250 lb-ft
Transmission: Five-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Length x width x height: 200.1 x 74.5 x 58.2 in
Wheelbase: 120.0 in
Curb weight: 3727 lb
Fuel economy (EPA city/hwy): 17/25 mpg
Safety equipment: Multi-stage front airbags and side-curtain airbags; anti-lock brakes; traction control; electronic stability control with tire-pressure monitors
Major standard features: Air conditioning; power windows/locks/mirrors; electric rear defroster; 18-inch wheels; cruise control; tilt/telescoping steering wheel; AM/FM/CD player
Warranty: Three years/36,000 miles; seven years/70,000 powertrain

Ok to set the record straight the new CHALLENGER will not weigh 4000#. The 4 door CHARGER only weighs 3700. If you look at all the safety gizmos and and luxury doodads. Its a wonder it isnt 2.5 tons.

I Feel they have missed the mark on the new CAMARO. Its styling is just odd to me. The whole car reminds me of a 72 grand prix too long in front and the stumpy rear is just not sexy.

I agree with some posters retro would look better. Good looks are timeless thats my point and I am sticking to it.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-14-2006, 01:06 AM
96z28ss's Avatar
96z28ss 96z28ss is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 18
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezduster

Ok to set the record straight the new CHALLENGER will not weigh 4000#. The 4 door CHARGER only weighs 3700. If you look at all the safety gizmos and and luxury doodads. Its a wonder it isnt 2.5 tons.

Okay maybe a production version won't weigh over 4000 lbs, but the concept car did weigh over 4000 lbs. Atleast thats what the tag says.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net