...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Cooling: Radiators/Fans/Controllers
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-06-2009, 12:26 AM
CarlC CarlC is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 641
Thanks: 12
Thanked 112 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
That's a good idea if you are using an air based cooler. But, if you're running one through the radiator they it's unnessary since the water will warm the oil in addition to cooling it.
Not so.

On cool days the oil temperature in mine during normal cruise the oil temps get to maybe 150*. On the freeway, 140*. If I hammer it for a while, 180*. On warm days it will get up to over 200* occasionally.

I would really like the oil temp to be 210-220* during normal operation, so a thermostat is in the planning stages. I may go with a Mocal, but the CV part is really nice.

No matter how much heat turbos may add to the oil, if the oil is overheating a cooler is needed. Worst case the cooler will delay the onset of overheating, but the amount of oil a turbo uses is much smaller than that used in the rest of the engine, which creates a lot of waste heat during high-horsepower output.
__________________
http:www.vaporworx.com
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-06-2009, 08:35 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
Not so.

On cool days the oil temperature in mine during normal cruise the oil temps get to maybe 150*. On the freeway, 140*. If I hammer it for a while, 180*. On warm days it will get up to over 200* occasionally.

I would really like the oil temp to be 210-220* during normal operation, so a thermostat is in the planning stages. I may go with a Mocal, but the CV part is really nice.
Hmm.. the techies at C&R is where I got my info. Interesting.

My water temp is never below 190, so shouldn't the oil always end up near this since it's warmed by the water much like it's cooled by the water?
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-06-2009, 10:20 AM
David Pozzi's Avatar
David Pozzi David Pozzi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575
Thanks: 2
Thanked 58 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
Not so.

On cool days the oil temperature in mine during normal cruise the oil temps get to maybe 150*. On the freeway, 140*. If I hammer it for a while, 180*. On warm days it will get up to over 200* occasionally.

I would really like the oil temp to be 210-220* during normal operation, so a thermostat is in the planning stages. I may go with a Mocal, but the CV part is really nice.

No matter how much heat turbos may add to the oil, if the oil is overheating a cooler is needed. Worst case the cooler will delay the onset of overheating, but the amount of oil a turbo uses is much smaller than that used in the rest of the engine, which creates a lot of waste heat during high-horsepower output.
Carl,
Was this with your old engine with cooler and radiator inlet on the same side? The LS enters the pass side right?

The way it should work is the oil heat exchanger should be on the radiator inlet side tank receiving the warmest coolant. I'm getting a Be Cool rad and it's double pass, they have to put the exchanger in the pass side tank.

Thermostat valves take up a bit of room especially with all the extra plumbing. The cleanest way would be to have it on the engine block. I don't think you need to actually shut off the rad cooler and open the bypass. I think just opening a bypass would be enough, the cooler should have enough extra resistance to flow that would not allow much flow thru it when the bypass is open.
__________________
http://www.PozziRacing.com
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-06-2009, 12:00 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Pozzi View Post
Carl,
Was this with your old engine with cooler and radiator inlet on the same side? The LS enters the pass side right?

The way it should work is the oil heat exchanger should be on the radiator inlet side tank receiving the warmest coolant. I'm getting a Be Cool rad and it's double pass, they have to put the exchanger in the pass side tank.

Thermostat valves take up a bit of room especially with all the extra plumbing. The cleanest way would be to have it on the engine block. I don't think you need to actually shut off the rad cooler and open the bypass. I think just opening a bypass would be enough, the cooler should have enough extra resistance to flow that would not allow much flow thru it when the bypass is open.
A factory LS radiator (from GM) has the inlet on the drivers side and the exit (lower) on the pass side.

Most aftermarket LS radiators have the inlet and outlet both on the pass side to make plumbing cleaner. That's how my current AFCO is and how the C&R unit is.

My new AFCO will have both on the pass side and the cooler will be on the upper driver's side like the C&R unit.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-06-2009, 09:29 PM
CarlC CarlC is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 641
Thanks: 12
Thanked 112 Times in 37 Posts
Default

With the C&R dual-pass radiator the oil cooler is placed in the mid-tank. Hence, the engine coolant has already gone through 1/2 of the cooling cycle. By the time the coolant, which exits the engine at thermostat temperature, gets to the mid-tank it has cooled significantly. This keeps oil temperatures low on cool days.

It's the same for both the previous 406 and the current LS. On warm days while street driving it takes quite a bit to get the oil into the 220* range. On track days it performs very well. Having the cooler in the return tank would help keep oil temperatures up.

David,

The inlet/outlet are on the RH side and the oil cooler is on the LH (pics on website). I think the Mocal type could be used with only one extra hose in my application. I've thought of a simple bypass as well. Any hints on a good design/parts?

Though I like the design of the ATS pan it would have been really nice to have a sandwich-type thermostat adapter, even if it meant having to 90* the filter to make it work. Having the thermostat built in to the radiator heat exchanger would also be kind trick but a nightmare if servicing was needed.
__________________
http:www.vaporworx.com

Last edited by CarlC; 02-06-2009 at 09:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-06-2009, 09:31 PM
chicane's Avatar
chicane chicane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 560
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
Oh and there will be an "oil cooler 101" type story.
Nice... definately, looking forword to that and getting the 'tech' out to the masses.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-06-2009, 10:20 PM
JNS JNS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Y-TRY View Post
Would it be futile to try and cool the oil in a turbo set-up?
nate- you still got your turbo setup in the 68?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-07-2009, 10:20 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicane View Post
Nice... definately, looking forword to that and getting the 'tech' out to the masses.
Right now I'm doing a shock tech story.. like a "shock 101" deal.

My problem is that I have more story ideas than I have time.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:08 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Not sure how the LS motors are bypassed but I have recently learned you need to increase the blow off pressure of the bypass when running a cooler or remote oil filter. (At least on a genv/vi big block) 11 to 30 lbs in my case.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-27-2009, 01:26 AM
Y-TRY Y-TRY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 291
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JNS View Post
nate- you still got your turbo setup in the 68?
Yep, I still have it all but the car is on a rack right now for paint/body. I commited to the project before the economy went South. It's still moving forward albeit a bit slower.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net