...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-24-2009, 12:44 PM
parsonsj parsonsj is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
If it is a true street car, even with some moderate autocross or lapping, don't get overboard with caster and camber gain; and choosing a suspension frequency "race car" high will make it terrible to drive on real roads. Be realistic.
Amen. Double Amen. Sing it to the heavens, my brotha!!!

Race car suspensions aren't really that enjoyable on the street. No doubt it's cool to take freeway off-ramps at triple their rated speed, but the rest of the time a twitchy, tire-wearing, bone-rattling, NVH on steriods ride will just annoy and tire you out.

Make your shocks adjustable, keep your caster and camber at reasonable levels, don't go for too-quick steering, and use bushings with some compliance.

jp
__________________
John Parsons

II Much Fabrication's Blog New products, Fabrication sequences, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-24-2009, 12:48 PM
parsonsj parsonsj is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
For some reason, people always want to build a car around an existing set of wheels
You're right: it's all about making sure the suspension will fit inside the car body. Reasonable choices here make the rest go much better.

jp

ps. And Matt, it was your boss who taught me to choose the wheels and tires first. Art wouldn't make me a chassis until I spec'ed the wheels.
__________________
John Parsons

II Much Fabrication's Blog New products, Fabrication sequences, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-24-2009, 01:47 PM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Guys,

This is exactly what I was hoping for. I have seen the need for this type of info, but didn't know how to go about extracting it. I feel like a lawyer here, asking all these leading questions. I figured if I could get some recognized people in the industry to speak up it would have more credibility than some nobody spouting off.

Matt,

When I said I picked wheels and tires first, I meant for diameter. Then i choose my ride height. It looks like we all tend to agree on this point.

I also agree with issues dealing with driving a race car on the street. When people get it, most don't like it. I guess that is why they call them "Race" cars and "Street" cars. I guarantee I would not want to drive a car that rode like my circle track cars on the street for very long.

Later,
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-24-2009, 02:57 PM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post

ps. And Matt, it was your boss who taught me to choose the wheels and tires first. Art wouldn't make me a chassis until I spec'ed the wheels.
Yeah, wheels and tires need to be picked when doing our chassis or else we don't know how wide to set the rear clip or what hub track width to use. But when designing a suspension from scratch, only a range of wheel sizes and backspacing is needed...instead of designing the suspension around an existing set, which only puts limitations on the design and will more likely be less than optimum.

Heh, who does Art think he is, anyway? (just kidding!)
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-24-2009, 03:32 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm going to tiptoe through here and make a suggestion.

Why not try and separate both types of suspension? Street and Race. I think this will help focus a lot of questions that everyone would like to hear the answers to within that specific genre. Maybe pick a model of car for street that is typical and run through the process of setting it up. A camaro maybe? Same for a race car although in that case you're not really limited by packaging constraints other than whatever the rulebooks limit you too.

John
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-24-2009, 05:31 PM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novanutcase View Post
I'm going to tiptoe through here and make a suggestion.

Why not try and separate both types of suspension? Street and Race. I think this will help focus a lot of questions that everyone would like to hear the answers to within that specific genre. Maybe pick a model of car for street that is typical and run through the process of setting it up. A camaro maybe? Same for a race car although in that case you're not really limited by packaging constraints other than whatever the rulebooks limit you too.

John
Sweet! I'm game. John, that's why you get the big bucks. You're an idea man!

We don't even have to say "Camaro". We could just give a jump off point.

I'll throw this out to what you guys think.

Front Tire diameter: 25.5"
Rear Tire diameter: 26"

Front Track Width: 60"
Rear Track Width: 61"

Wheel Base: 108"


Start here and indicate whether you are setting up a street car or a race car. If this doesn't work, where should we start?
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-24-2009, 06:49 PM
parsonsj parsonsj is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Posts: 659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Sure ... this could be fun.

But we need more contraints: wheel diameter? what kind of spindle? base chassis? engine placement?

jp
__________________
John Parsons

II Much Fabrication's Blog New products, Fabrication sequences, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-24-2009, 07:26 PM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parsonsj View Post
Sure ... this could be fun.

But we need more contraints: wheel diameter? what kind of spindle? base chassis? engine placement?

jp
Constraints...we don't need no stinking constraints! Sorry I couldn't resist.

I would say for the race car, you choose with regard to all of those.

For a street car, how about:

18" Wheels

You choose the spindle. That is part of the magic, right? Anyway this seems to be an area of great debate lately.

Custom Chassis with the track width and wheel base i mentioned above. With these dimensions it should be close to alot of cars guys on this site are working on. Right or wrong I don't think in most cases it is cost effective to modify a stock chassis to the extent that some do. JMO

Front Engine. Hmmmmmm how to explain placement. For the street it would have to fit in an engine bay with in reason.


These are just suggestions on my part to keep this going. I am open to any suggestions.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:17 PM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccracin View Post
Constraints...we don't need no stinking constraints! Sorry I couldn't resist.

I would say for the race car, you choose with regard to all of those.

For a street car, how about:

18" Wheels

You choose the spindle. That is part of the magic, right? Anyway this seems to be an area of great debate lately.

Custom Chassis with the track width and wheel base i mentioned above. With these dimensions it should be close to alot of cars guys on this site are working on. Right or wrong I don't think in most cases it is cost effective to modify a stock chassis to the extent that some do. JMO

Front Engine. Hmmmmmm how to explain placement. For the street it would have to fit in an engine bay with in reason.


These are just suggestions on my part to keep this going. I am open to any suggestions.
There ya go!

I'm sure a lot of guys that don't really understand what a street type suspension is made of will get some great info from this thread. I see a lot of guys setting up race suspensions that will, more than likely, never see the track. This thread can help them differentiate what is considered best for street and what is considered best for race or any mix thereof!

I would think that setting up a race suspension would be easier since most of the components and setups are pretty tried and true for the most part but seeing all these great race parts a lot of times many people get mesmerized by the allure of the part not realizing that for their application it would be better to use something more geared for the street.

I know I'll be reading posts from Matt, John and whoever else chimes in(Norm Peterson, Where are you?!?) VERY CAREFULLY and absorbing as much as I can.

John

BTW thanks for your advice on the fire suppresion system. I don't think I ever really thanked you for your advice!

Last edited by novanutcase; 02-24-2009 at 08:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:19 PM
fasterpatrick's Avatar
fasterpatrick fasterpatrick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Very good thread guys, but all I have to add is been there done that. If you what to find a geometry nirvana give up. I spent six months studying countless chassis design books and geometry articles for every type of car imaginable. My head hurt for weeks afterword. What I came up with is a untested compromise of every thing I absorbed. Sorry there are no numbers to give out did not use them. If you want to design a suspension system start at the corners and work inward at ride height, thats the best way I found.
I'll be watching,




Patrick
__________________
http://www.clubcobra.com/photopost/s...0&ppuser=23754

Well, it occurs to me that perhaps not all of the modifications I made are technically 'street legal'

Nothing good ever happened after this statement;
Hey Moe watch this!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net