Quote:
Originally Posted by mrr1999
would you say the control arms between DSE and Speed-Tech are comparable in feel/performance? I know the welding processes are different, but since I won't be hard-core autoX or road racing it ever, I doubt that weld strength will ever be an issue.
|
I just went to both web sites, read the description just for the upper arms. They are both solid pieces. Whats the diff in the welding process? Both appear to be tig welded, in a jig Im sure. The welds wont be an issue with either arm. They both use a great bearing surfaces too, no poly there. Both use a delrin bushing. One is a Acetron GP. I personally like Delrin AF. But anyway, both much better than poly.
Decent site that talks about the diff delrins.
http://www.quadrantepp.com/default.aspx?pageid=78
Ill be honest, I dont see too much of a diff for quality just from the pics. The geometry looks to be similar too.
The speedtechs are 150 bucks less if that means anything. JR
Oh yeah, one more thing I noticed. The speedtech uses a castle nut and cotter pin. In a way I like those more than the nylocks. Never had a nylock come loose, but the castle nut is a positive locking nut. But.... I like the nylocks for being able to creep up on the side load of the bushing and get it just right. And if you also like nylocks they can be put on the speedtech arms. I actually like solid metal locknuts. They have more cycles for on and off. Nylocks are good for three or so cycles they say. I usually dont like to remove and use them more than twice. On my car I use metal locknuts for the lower arm bolt cause the nut is just about touching my header tube, gets kinda warm there.
Ok, Im not done picking the nits LOL Im looking at the bushing setups. It appears DSE uses an aluminum sleeve between the plastic and the CA. And the ST uses the plastic between the CA and shaft. I dont see too much of a prob with the aluminum sleeve as long as it stays tied to the CA in rotation. If it slips and rotates separate of the CA I can see some galling taking place between the aluminum and steel. I like the two bearing surface bushings (CA to plastic then plastic to shaft) of the ST VS the three bearing surface (CA to aluminum, aluminum to plastic, plastic to shaft). Im sure they dont have a problem, just my preference. I imagine they did it to be able to have a nice machined surface (the aluminum sleeve) riding on the plastic VS the DOM tube of the CA. But both surfaces of the bushing, OD and ID shouldnt be in rotation, just one. So if the plastic grabs the steel CA and slides on the shaft then thats a good setup.
Ok, how bout the lowers. They both look like solid pieces, well constructed and powder coated for the duration. Looks like with the ST arms you can use either stock springs or coilovers. The DSE you buy which arm you want for which spring you are gonna use. They both have steering and bump stops and delrin bushings. Whats odd is I didnt see the zerk fitting to grease the bushings, and even delrin can be helped with some grease. I like lubriplate "special auto-marine grease" Surpasses some of the better synthetic greases in a couple specs.
Oh, and the prices for the lower arms are about the same. List prices. Im sure one of the dealers here can get you free shipping or 10% list on the arms. common dealer discounts.
Ok, so there is my look on it. They both have great arms. I dont think you will go wrong with either company really.. Drop the hammer!!!!!
DSE uppers
Speed Techs uppers
DSE lowers
Speed Tech lowers