...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-25-2010, 12:10 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Not to hi-jack this thread or take any credit away from the Speed tech crew, but Steve is not making excuses for the vette's performance, only stating the facts. I agree that this is a "run what ya brung" event. What we "brung" was a car that was completely dialed in from a suspension stand point, but was lacking on the interior. There were huge issues on the interior ergonomics that made it difficult for anyone to sit in the car. Unfortunately the interior was the one area of the car that we did not build, and it has caused the most problems. The interior is being completely re-done currently to correct this issue. We were able to pick up an additional 4" of length and lower the seat by 1.5" as well as adding in the much needed bolstering, all by building complete new seats. Due to time constraints, we could not get this completed before the event. We tried to put a bandage on the situation by installing a Cobra racing seat from another car which did give the much needed bolstering and slightly better seating position, but it still had an awkward driving position. The other big issue was with the floor mounted pedals designed for our customer's size 11 shoe. Mary told me that her much smaller foot was barely reaching the pedal pads with her toes. Its pretty hard to make a car perform when you can't reach the pedals, or sit correctly in it.

When I drove the car on the autocross after Mary was finished, I dropped almost 2 full seconds off of her time. Steve, is it possible for you to post the actual time with me driving the car now that the article is out?

I am not making excuses either, but I think it was pretty obvious to anyone there that Mary was not pushing the corvette anywhere near its limits. The majority of that was due to the ergonomics and fitment in the car.

Again, not to take anything away from the Speed Tech camaro as it definitely did perform great in all 3 areas!
__________________
www.roadstershop.com

Last edited by Roadster Shop; 02-25-2010 at 12:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:09 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

It's nice to see you guys are human like the rest of us. I agree that the drivers comfort level has everything to do with how fast you ultimately go. That's a huge part of being fast, making the car feel comfortable in your hands and getting the balance right. The ergonomics we're largely engineered by GM in the Camaro and custom in the Vette. Just another of the million little things that make the difference between a good and great car especially is such a custom build. I"m still impressed that you guys flog on that masterpiece. I'd be scared to death to drive it 9/10ths. I'm sure Mary will take her 2nd chance to drive it.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-25-2010, 01:19 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS-Perf View Post
When I drove the car on the autocross after Mary was finished, I dropped almost 2 full seconds off of her time. Steve, is it possible for you to post the actual time with me driving the car now that the article is out?
I don't have that time... just the official times. Joe or Nick might have them.. not sure.

And none of this takes anything away from how well the Speed Tech Camaro did in the event.

I'm sure next year everyone will keep in mind that car needs to fit our test driver. lol
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-25-2010, 03:40 PM
Rod P's Avatar
Rod P Rod P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

good job boys
__________________
Rod Prouty
My websiteAuto-cross 101
I'm not a Real Racer but I did spend a night in the Pozzi's motor-home
Bangshift Stories
I’m not the smartest guy at the track … but when he goes home … I’m still there testing, tuning, learning & getting faster.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-26-2010, 01:38 PM
youthpastor's Avatar
youthpastor youthpastor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty68 View Post
good job boys
Just picked up the article at lunch time. We are working close with speed-tech on the Trans- Am inspired 68 Camaro- Just picked up all the goodies- subframe and total suspension package- front and rear

and after the article we are stoked to get some real world tests with an aluminum LS6 and T-56- instead of the "boat anchor... That sounds totally WICKED in person! - that's the problem with magazines- that 396 with 3" exhaust is sweet- no substition -Chris
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
CHRIS HOLSTROM CONCEPTS

http://chrisholstromconcepts.com/

Last edited by youthpastor; 02-26-2010 at 01:40 PM. Reason: added stuff
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net