...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:02 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uxojerry View Post
Attachment 42394

This engine is $21.5k as depicted but is all aluminum. Ive seen other vendors doing iron blocks for less. I didnt say it was cheap, but it is not astronomical either.


Oh yeah -- but you just forgot to add the aforementioned EFI.... Can't really compare carb motors to EFI.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:18 PM
uxojerry uxojerry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok add $3k for the FAST 1.0 and 2nd TBI option.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:26 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uxojerry View Post
Ok add $3k for the FAST 1.0 and 2nd TBI option.

BTW -- I was just yanking your chain! But you know this group is going to hold everyones feet to the fire!

HAHAHAHAHA --- Okay -- that's MORE THAN THREE TIMES what I just spent for a LS3....
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:31 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,688
Thanks: 458
Thanked 688 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uxojerry View Post
You could order the drag pack motor with the 8 stack and still be $3k-$4k under the cost of the LS9 with all of the hardware. Either engine is available in aluminum.
Jerry, for the simple fact the LS9 is supercharged, of course a carbed or 8 stack will be cheaper. The supercharger is $7k alone. So, there's the difference right there.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:33 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 214Chevelle View Post
Jerry, for the simple fact the LS9 is supercharged, of course a carbed or 8 stack will be cheaper. The supercharger is $7k alone. So, there's the difference right there.



He's not going to win his case...... no matter how hard he's going to try.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA <laughing like that trucker dude on Ice Road Truckers>
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:43 PM
uxojerry uxojerry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Your right Gregg, lol. Progress starts in baby steps!! Here is some real sacrilege as a C2 Corvette or any other Corvette model never had a W motor.

Name:  Iron Block W409 with Hilborn.jpg
Views: 134
Size:  62.0 KB

Name:  W409 2nd pic.jpg
Views: 126
Size:  67.9 KB

I love following the high end C6 Corvette FI builds where they are hitting 1100rwhp+ and are forced to revert back to a modified Power Glide or Turbo 400 to handle all of the horsepower, lol. I shall not bring up the venerable Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-06-2013, 09:45 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,688
Thanks: 458
Thanked 688 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
He's not going to win his case...... no matter how hard he's going to try.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA <laughing like that trucker dude on Ice Road Truckers>
I know right GW. Also, The LS9 is packed with forged goodies in order to handle boost. Therefore, making it ultimately more expensive. A carbed motor that Jerry is harping about can be built with basic bottom to middle parts for N/A if someone wanted to save money.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-06-2013, 10:00 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,688
Thanks: 458
Thanked 688 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Also, comparing EFI/supercharged motors to carbed-N/A motors is like comparing 3-piece wheels to cast wheels. Of course one is more expensive than the other. There's just no comparison in general. Will a carbed motor get the job done just like a cast wheel will...yes. Is it necessary to spend $12-$20k or more on an EFI or supercharged motor like it's necessary to spend $8k-$10k or more on 3-piece wheels...no. See where I'm going with the comparison thing?
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-06-2013, 10:15 PM
preston preston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 653
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I'm going through this debate right now - Last build of my SBF I put on too big of heads and with low CR and a small cam I have classic low end sogginess. At this point in my life I think I would really appreciate a full on OEM programmed combination - With the twins, I am never lacking for all out power, but I want it to have GREAT throttle response and OEM manners rather than me programming it on an aftermarket EFI and guessing at a good combo. The two options are LS or Coyote, and the Coyote will just not fit (custom tube chassis).

But a Mustang like mine cannot have an LS motor...Tried it in my mind, couldn't do it. So when I get back to the engine I'm thinking of ponying up having Kaase or someone equivalent take my good parts and specify a killer top end combination but even with pro help programming it will never match OEM based EFI LS driveability and startup and mileage. I love the idea that with modern heads and cam technology and a sheet metal or ITB manifold, I can have something a little wonderful compared to the past, but its definitely not going to be as ea$y as the modern LS combos.

So I hate to agree with the argument, but brand heritage is the ONLY reason I don't go with an LS. Plus, I guess its a little bit more interesting when bench racing to have the old skool motor. And that Coyote makes good power, and winds up high, but...its still just a 5.0 too.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-06-2013, 10:15 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 214Chevelle View Post
Also, comparing EFI/supercharged motors to carbed-N/A motors is like comparing 3-piece wheels to cast wheels. Of course one is more expensive than the other. There's just no comparison in general. Will a carbed motor get the job done just like a cast wheel will...yes. Is it necessary to spend $12-$20k or more on an EFI or supercharged motor like it's necessary to spend $8k-$10k or more on 3-piece wheels...no. See where I'm going with the comparison thing?



I just had one off billet wheels built (actually Roy Brizio had them built) for the '33.... I haven't seen the bill yet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net