...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-29-2013, 10:38 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
You give up some drivability with the 2.0.

I encourage you to download all the different manufacturers software and compare them for yourself before you buy anything..
Mark,
Have you had hands on experience with the FAST 2.0 ? I hear conflicting reports. Some bad, some good. I think factual information if you (or anyone else) has experience ... would benefit us all.


Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:19 AM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes, I've done a few in the last year or so. There's one or two on here that I did via email.

I was all giddy when I got the chance to tune one for the first time. Saw all the advertisements etc. I though I would be impressed. Instead I was very disappointed.
Does it have some neat features? Absolutely, i.e. E85/Flex Fuel capability, traction control (although most say the MSD 7 one works better), self learning etc.

But it only has 2 transient fueling tables, most other systems have 4 or 5, very important for the ultimate in drivability, no secondary MAP sensor and the individual cylinder trim for fuel and spark is an all or nothing calibration. In other words, you can't tailor the individual spark and fuel by rpm and/or load so it's useless in most applications. Plus the self learning can cause problems, and that only saves the tuner an hour or so anyway.

Just remember one thing. Just because something is advertised the most doesn't automatically mean it will be the best. And especially lately I've heard their tech ain't all it's cracked up to be.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.

Last edited by supremeefi; 12-30-2013 at 10:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:29 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
Yes, I've done a few in the last year or so. There's one or two on here that I did via email.

I was all giddy when I got the chance to tune one for the first time. Saw all the advertisements etc. I though I would be impressed. I was very disappointed instead.
Does it have some neat features? Absolutely, i.e. E85/Flex Fuel capability, traction control (although most say the MSD 7 one works better), self learning etc.

But it only has 2 transient fueling tables, most other systems have 4 or 5, very important for the ultimate in drivability. No secondary MAP sensor and the individual cylinder trim for fuel and spark is an all or nothing calibration. In other words, you can't tailor the individual spark and fuel by rpm and/or load so it's useless in most applications. Plus the self learning can cause problems, and that only saves the tuner an hour or so anyway.

Just remember one thing. Just because something is advertised the most doesn't automatically mean it will be the best.

In your experience, does anyone offer a EFI package that has:
1. Tunable fuel curve throughout the rpm range
2. Tunable ignition curve throughout the rpm range
3. Automatically adjusts for load
4. Ignition & fuel tuning for individual cylinders
5. Allows easy transition between fuel types

Thanks for sharing.

__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:34 AM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Most do the first four real well. However adding the fifth feature narrows the perspective field a bit. I'd say today the best option that covers all five features listed would be the new AEM Infinity and maybe the Holley Dominator.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:40 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
Most do the first four real well. However adding the fifth feature narrows the perspective field a bit. I'd say today the best option that covers all five features listed would be the new AEM Infinity and maybe the Holley Dominator.
What you said in post #32 seems to say the FAST 2.0 doesn't do the individual cylinder tuning very well. Correct?

What are the other things it doesn't do well, that you feel another brand/model does well?

__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:17 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
What you said in post #32 seems to say the FAST 2.0 doesn't do the individual cylinder tuning very well. Correct?

Correct, the Accel does individual fueling by load and rpm. The AEM Infinity does fuel and spark by rpm alone. I believe there are others that have more there than the FAST. The FAST has the least on that part.

What are the other things it doesn't do well, that you feel another brand/model does well?

As mentioned it's at a loss when it comes to drivability tuning. Will it run o.k.? Sure it will. However any given application could drive better with a more transient tunable system. Again FAST has 2 tables, most others have twice that.

Hope this helps.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.

Last edited by supremeefi; 12-30-2013 at 12:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-30-2013, 12:24 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Thanks Mark!
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-30-2013, 01:40 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

While we're hijacking...

Where does the Holley HP EFI fall in your ranking, or do you have experience with that system?

Thanx!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-30-2013, 04:35 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Imo better than the FAST 2.0.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-30-2013, 05:36 PM
dhutton dhutton is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 535 Times in 293 Posts
Default

OK, any feedback on Edelbrock Pro Flo 2?

Thanks,
Don
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net