...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Off Topic Forums
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4161  
Old 07-01-2014, 09:04 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

RE: ABOVE POST


The point - which I failed to include in the above post..

Companies that come to market -- or are in the market already - who's SHARE PRICE are built on HIGH GROWTH EXPECTATIONS... need to have every metric GROWING not "decelerating". They can fail to make a profit for quite a few quarters and still be rewarded with a high P/E share price... but high growth needs to be high growth or you get your ass handed to you. That's pretty basic fundamentals.
Reply With Quote
  #4162  
Old 07-01-2014, 12:46 PM
sebtarta sebtarta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Greg what do you think about this company Mannkind being approved on their insulin inhaler for diabetes? MNKD
Reply With Quote
  #4163  
Old 07-01-2014, 02:21 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebtarta View Post
Greg what do you think about this company Mannkind being approved on their insulin inhaler for diabetes? MNKD


I don't -- because I don't know anything about the company. Plus I don't do recommendations about when - who - what - how much - etc.... I'm more or a "how to think about stuff" kinda guy.

Only names that really get discussed on here are the ones just used as examples or what to think about and here's why kind of discussions.
Reply With Quote
  #4164  
Old 07-01-2014, 05:59 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 743
Thanks: 10
Thanked 56 Times in 36 Posts
Default

As an addition to the "way of thinking" discussion as it pertains to boutique pharma companies...I would never want to invest (remember investing and gambling differ) my $$ with a firm whose revenue, income, hopes and dreams are riding on the FDA approval of one product. Not saying the one you mentioned is, as like Greg, I know nothing about the company.

These firms are not valued the way most best-of-breed companies you've seen discussed in this thread are. So might you miss out on a 400% gain when the new product gets green lit through the final stage of FDA approval? Sure...but you might also miss out on a 50+% loss when the thing dies on the vine since the market knows their product pipeline had nothing else in it.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #4165  
Old 07-01-2014, 06:17 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

Good reply JK...


I looked at the company after the OP... Just because I love this stuff.


So to use them as an example... MannKind (MNKD).


Over the long term chart - they're DOWN 27% -- and that's AFTER a 58% run up in the stock prior to getting the FDA approval for the newest drug.

No dividend. And the stock was at $20 in '07 then dropped like a rock to $3 and less for about 5 years. A couple short term blips to the $10 range when I would ASSume some news about stage this or that trials were favorable. Then sold off right back to the bottom.


Here's the investing 102.

I can't possibly spend enough time to be up to date on the latest greatest drug trial - or who has a competing product in the pipeline... Not to mention I hate Yo-Yo stocks. Rich one day broke the next. No dividend. No knowledge. No investment.

There's no doubt that if you can stay on top of this stuff - there's HUGE money to be made... There's also huge money to be lost when your picks fail to get approval - or get sued because somebody did something which is blamed on the drug or treatment. I'm not being negative -- I'm just being truthful for what happens to 9 out of 10 investments like this.

If you're in the business -- up to date -- understand the MARKET or the product that is ultimately brought to market... Then maybe you can make some money in these.

But this is INVESTING 102... not "let's pick the next hot stock to lose money on"... and I would think that unless a guy is playing with several hundred thousand dollars -- he should steer clear of the "next hot thing".

I play with some of this kind of stuff... but I don't discuss it in this thread because it's just not appropriate. That would need to be a different thread titled --- What rich guys do with their play money -- or something along those lines... Or Stock market gambling how to lose money overnight. :>) Maybe "I went to bed rich and woke up broke"? I kinda like that one. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Reply With Quote
  #4166  
Old 07-02-2014, 07:44 AM
CamaroMike's Avatar
CamaroMike CamaroMike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Maybe its just me but whenever I hear something about pharmaceutical stocks I think of JP Marlin and Stratton Oakmont lol
__________________
Alabama
1969 Camaro
1978 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #4167  
Old 07-02-2014, 08:54 AM
toy71camaro toy71camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California (Stanislaus County)
Posts: 444
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Maybe "I went to bed rich and woke up broke"? I kinda like that one. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
lmao. Thats a good one. That could be a bit interesting!

__________________
Albert


My Toy... is actually a 1973 Camaro LT and a '09 HD Dyna.
Reply With Quote
  #4168  
Old 07-02-2014, 08:59 AM
toy71camaro toy71camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern California (Stanislaus County)
Posts: 444
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Oh, and a side note:

7/1 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: KO
7/2 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: KMB
6/27 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: LMT

Woot! Paydays.
__________________
Albert


My Toy... is actually a 1973 Camaro LT and a '09 HD Dyna.
Reply With Quote
  #4169  
Old 07-02-2014, 10:29 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroMike View Post
Maybe its just me but whenever I hear something about pharmaceutical stocks I think of JP Marlin and Stratton Oakmont lol




I had to look that up to see what the reference was. I never saw the movie. But yes --- the parallel could be made there. And not just pharma stocks - but any company where there is similar "amazing upside" but little in actual real business to back that up except a lick and a promise.

To be clear --- with all due respect to Sebtarta (the OP) I mean no disrespect for his question. If you're new to the thread -- without reading about half a billion pages -- you would have missed the full idea behind the thread. So - Sebtarta - please don't take our pokes at this type of investing as a personal shot. But this type of investing is EXACTLY what this thread is about in a 180* way. The thread became a blog almost - but about how to safely invest - how to get started investing - how to stay invested without gambling or stewing about big quick losses etc. So unfortunately for your questing -- it played right into the "WHAT NOT TO DO" that this thread has tried to cover.





Quote:
Originally Posted by toy71camaro View Post
lmao. Thats a good one. That could be a bit interesting!




It happens all the time....







Quote:
Originally Posted by toy71camaro View Post
Oh, and a side note:

7/1 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: KO
7/2 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: KMB
6/27 = DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT: LMT

Woot! Paydays.


Don't ya just love getting paid like that! It's just such a satisfying feeling. Regardless of the AMOUNTS --- just seeing those credits to your account brings a smile to a guys face.
Reply With Quote
  #4170  
Old 07-02-2014, 11:00 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

So let's just stay on this question about MannKind (MNKD) for another post.



A couple days ago -- the big news was about the FDA approval of a new product for them --- which created the question from Sebtarta. To which I responded that "I don't know anything about them".

That quote is really larger than just about the one single company. I have often stated in this thread to stick to what you know and understand. To do otherwise is a tar pit trap. You buy based on something you've heard - or buy because something is going up and CNBC is talking about it... But you really have no GD idea what the larger picture is - competitors - revenue - growth potential - management... etc.


So this is TODAYS news on MannKind (MNKD) --- and bam! Down 4.5% from yesterday. When I'm trying to earn 4.5% or 5% in dividends (and get capital growth on top of that) I don't need to be down that much in one day. And these kinds of stocks are purely NEWS DRIVEN or event driven. UP DOWN UP DOWN... Personally... my stomach can't deal with that.

Now -- the stock could shoot to the moon.... and many people could make a killing on it. But you could also just as easily get killed. I don't want to invest in that kind of risk. I'd rather be like Albert and roll out my dividend calendar! LOL



Cut and pasted:



MannKind Corporation (NASDAQ:MNKD)’s inhaled insulin drug Afrezza won the USFDA approval on Friday, June 27 for type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Though it’s a positive for the biopharma company that doesn’t yet generate a revenue, there are some big concerns around potential commercialization of Afrezza. That’s the key reason JPMorgan’s biotechnology analyst Cory Kasimov still has a Neutral rating on the stock with $6 price target, reflecting about 40% downside potential.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net