...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #441  
Old 05-16-2010, 08:38 PM
olds87 olds87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 307
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Dang man you car sound sick.
__________________
James W.
1987 Oldsmobile
Cutlass Supreme
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 05-17-2010, 02:21 AM
evilzee28 evilzee28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 469
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post

Penny did good today.. Ran a 29.6xx which was in the top three i think.. we have an issue with the rear shocks bottoming out.. not good


Will be working with global west to do som tuning an their new Penske line of shocks
Hi Steve, just a query, at the beginning of this thread you said, QUOTE:-

"Bigger on the list was that David thought we needed more shock travel. Seems that were were on the stops durring hard turns and even on acceleration. We worked with Steve Duck over at RaceCar Dynamics and came up with a shock that's over two inches longer. The new Bilsteins are also revalved for the car. The extra length meant that we had to punch holes in the trunk floor so that this mount extender could be welded to the top of the existing brace. The top hole is for future changes if necessary."


Why are you still having trouble with the shocks bottoming out, I thought that this area had been addressed by "punching the holes in the trunk & welding in extenders"? Does this mean that you're changing from the Bilsteins to Penske shocks now? If so what's wrong with the Bilsteins? How much shock compression/travel are you getting with the set up as is? Could it be that your spring rate is wrong allowing an excessive amount of spring compression? Sorry for so many questions, but I'm sure that those people that are following this, wouldn't want to copy your set up & find it falls short of what they want, just as you have.

thanks....Nige
Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 05-17-2010, 07:06 AM
Payton King's Avatar
Payton King Payton King is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default If you are having

trouble getting in first without going to second...I believe you have a bad synchro.

Glad you car is back on the road.
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 05-17-2010, 07:41 AM
GrabberGT's Avatar
GrabberGT GrabberGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Wow! That sound! Its intoxicating.

Going to listen again.
__________________
Chris

Its not a Vega!!!!

Total Cost Involved - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - Fatman - MaverickMan Carbon
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:24 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilzee28 View Post
Hi Steve, just a query, at the beginning of this thread you said, QUOTE:-

"Bigger on the list was that David thought we needed more shock travel. Seems that were were on the stops durring hard turns and even on acceleration. We worked with Steve Duck over at RaceCar Dynamics and came up with a shock that's over two inches longer. The new Bilsteins are also revalved for the car. The extra length meant that we had to punch holes in the trunk floor so that this mount extender could be welded to the top of the existing brace. The top hole is for future changes if necessary."


Why are you still having trouble with the shocks bottoming out, I thought that this area had been addressed by "punching the holes in the trunk & welding in extenders"? Does this mean that you're changing from the Bilsteins to Penske shocks now? If so what's wrong with the Bilsteins? How much shock compression/travel are you getting with the set up as is? Could it be that your spring rate is wrong allowing an excessive amount of spring compression? Sorry for so many questions, but I'm sure that those people that are following this, wouldn't want to copy your set up & find it falls short of what they want, just as you have.

thanks....Nige
Because we keep softening up the springs to make the car more complian.. going from a 310 to 275 rear spring was just enought to cause the new problem.. I think the extra power makes the car want to squat down more as well.

normally we could dial in rebound or compression but my current shocks arnt adjustable.

Moral? get adjustable shocks if your going to do different types of performance events... just make sure you adjust them right

I will know more once Doug Nordin at GW takes a look and some measurements..
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:25 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

How much shock travel do you have available currently?
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:27 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Payton King View Post
trouble getting in first without going to second...I believe you have a bad synchro.

Glad you car is back on the road.
All of a sudden? Seemed fine back at optima.. then again it was acting up but we thought it was the bent clutch master rod...

Also has a hard time going into first if you are rolling more than 1MPH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
How much shock travel do you have available currently?
not enough! lol

Seriously.. the distance (maybe 4 inches) is only part of the problem.. compression setting is another. with the old springs and power it was fine, barely, but the didnt crash out.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS

Last edited by Steve1968LS2; 05-17-2010 at 09:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:32 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrabberGT View Post
Wow! That sound! Its intoxicating.

Going to listen again.
Thanks.. i love the new sound too

__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:36 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

No shiat sherlock... I have 2" of compression available with 175's and the RR bottoms but the LR has about a .25 left. Clearly mine is under a full hook left hander. Man, you run stiff springs like the TCI car. No wonder mine rides like a Cadillac.

That was a good tease, I bet you can't wait for a real track!
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 05-17-2010, 09:50 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
No shiat sherlock... I have 2" of compression available with 175's and the RR bottoms but the LR has about a .25 left. Clearly mine is under a full hook left hander. Man, you run stiff springs like the TCI car. No wonder mine rides like a Cadillac.

That was a good tease, I bet you can't wait for a real track!
Doug felt the if the car is this fast with these issues then it should be stupid fast once they are fixed.. even with me driving... lol
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net