...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-01-2009, 07:17 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
I'll stick with my bucket and poor gas mileage. I bet they come out with a bigger version if this becomes a success which it will. I'll let them work through any potential bugs in the coming months as well.
Yea, a Dominator version.. lol

You're assuming it has bugs..
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-01-2009, 09:07 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Pretty much...until it hits the real world you never know.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-02-2009, 01:24 AM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone know what this system retails for?

Edit: 2136.95 from Summit for the full kit. 1700.00+ for the kit less fuel pump and regulator.

Last edited by 70rs; 09-02-2009 at 01:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-02-2009, 08:39 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmorris View Post
LOL...could have at least read the title...
Yes you are so RIGHT!!

MY BAD...

Sometimes you just read - and then peck away... (okay don't go there!)

I'm going to use this system on my LS6 install... Will let you all know what I think after I'm done.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:24 PM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
Ok.. we tested the EZ-EFI today..

Installation.. WAY easy.. all the sensors along with the fuel injectors are contained in the throttle body. The only external sensor is one for water temp and of course the O2 sensor.

The interface is very easy to use. Install the unit, start the car and let it get to the specified operating temp (around 180-degrees). When you are in that area you hit a button and voila! it starts tuning itself.

Oh, there is one section where you set your AF ratios at Idle, Cruise, and WOT. You can also set a rev limiter (cuts fuel).

Once you make changes it takes a while for the system to "learn" and turn itself. So if this was in a car you would want to set it then drive around for an hour before you could consider it educated (although it always learns).

It bases most of it's tuning on the O2 sensor but there is an IAT and MAP sensor. It does NOT change the timing.

Fast says it is good for 550 to 600 but we found that in our test it's good for up to 500 crank hp. It's not that it runs out of fuel but more that it runs out of air.

We tested the unit and then swapped it for a carb. A 1000 cfm carb made more while a 750 cfm (4150 Holley) made almost the exact same as the EZ-EFI.

The rest was great.. the engine fired right up like it was an LS engine and once it learned the settings it was as happy as could be. Install was a snap as was tuning. For the $$$ it's a great option for those with moderatly powered engines looking for EFI on a budget.

There will be a dyno story in Super Chevy and a car install story in Camaro Performers.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Steve,

We have been talking to Casey Wegner about a 415ci LS motor with the EZ EFI on it. He said they have made 600+ with the system on an LS based engine. Any thoughts? Do you think it is the efficiency of the LS over the Big Block that is allowing it to do this?
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:56 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccracin View Post
Steve,

We have been talking to Casey Wegner about a 415ci LS motor with the EZ EFI on it. He said they have made 600+ with the system on an LS based engine. Any thoughts? Do you think it is the efficiency of the LS over the Big Block that is allowing it to do this?
Well, if you can make a given power level at a lower RPM then it will require less air.

Our test was on a 454 big block and it made less power with the EFI than it did with a larger (1000 or 950 CFM) carb. It was when we moved down to a 750 cfm carb that we got similar dyno numbers. It was down about 30 horsepower, not a hugh amount.

And yea, I think the efficiency of the LS helps. In our case the big-block made something like 502 hp and 535 tq.. on another engine, like an LS, it might make more. But, it can only move so much air. I need to ask FAST what CFM the throttle body is rated at. Going by the dyno data the fuel was fine, it (in our application) was just running out of air.

I would like to see your data and talk with you about the LS install. Email me at [email protected]

But the math says it can only support so much HP based on only having four injectors. Oh, our test was ran at a fuel pressure of 45 lbs.

Again, it's a great, easy to install system that covers a huge percentage of the engines out there, but if you are building an all out race engine you really need to step up to one of FASTs bigger systems.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-02-2009, 09:57 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Chad ---

Wegner has got to have some pretty good techs there... I'm thinking there are at least two mathematical issues here:

1: The flow rate of the injectors... you need "X" amount of fuel to support "X" amount of HP...

2: Air flow of the throttle body... again - "X" amount of cubic inches has to flow through this "restrictor" - no?

So I'm wondering -- since HP is only a mathematical equation based on TQ -- if the TQ number was good -- and the RPMS are through the roof - then maybe the actual math might be supported to make a bit more than their saying in their Ads?? They (they being FAST) most likely don't want to be responsible for guys going lean and wasting their brand new pride and joy...
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:16 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
Well, if you can make a given power level at a lower RPM then it will require less air.

Our test was on a 454 big block and it made less power with the EFI than it did with a larger (1000 or 950 CFM) carb. It was when we moved down to a 750 cfm carb that we got similar dyno numbers. It was down about 30 horsepower, not a hugh amount.

And yea, I think the efficiency of the LS helps. In our case the big-block made something like 502 hp and 535 tq.. on another engine, like an LS, it might make more. But, it can only move so much air. I need to ask FAST what CFM the throttle body is rated at. Going by the dyno data the fuel was fine, it (in our application) was just running out of air.

I would like to see your data and talk with you about the LS install. Email me at [email protected]

But the math says it can only support so much HP based on only having four injectors. Oh, our test was ran at a fuel pressure of 45 lbs.

Again, it's a great, easy to install system that covers a huge percentage of the engines out there, but if you are building an all out race engine you really need to step up to one of FASTs bigger systems.
Thanks Steve. E-mail sent.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:18 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Chad ---

Wegner has got to have some pretty good techs there... I'm thinking there are at least two mathematical issues here:

1: The flow rate of the injectors... you need "X" amount of fuel to support "X" amount of HP...

2: Air flow of the throttle body... again - "X" amount of cubic inches has to flow through this "restrictor" - no?

So I'm wondering -- since HP is only a mathematical equation based on TQ -- if the TQ number was good -- and the RPMS are through the roof - then maybe the actual math might be supported to make a bit more than their saying in their Ads?? They (they being FAST) most likely don't want to be responsible for guys going lean and wasting their brand new pride and joy...
I agree Greg. From talking with Casey Wegner, they definitely know what they are doing. I also know of them from my circle track days. I think there is more coming in this line of products from FAST. When I talked to their tech line they said that the next 90 days would show more. My problem is I have been offered a deal that is time sensative and I am not sure wether to pull the trigger or not.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-10-2009, 05:20 PM
Bakaruda's Avatar
Bakaruda Bakaruda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 301
Thanks: 22
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I helped a friend install one on his 70 Cuda with a 5.7L Hemi in it. Great stuff very easy to install and run. Oh for the mopar guys running the Gen III hemi you need to have the MSD ignition stuff as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net