Quote:
Originally Posted by MPM IV
Thanks for looking Greg. I believe that the A shares pay a 15% tax to the Netherlands where the B shares don't, which is why I chose B from the start. Due to my lack of experience I didn't even consider that they might pay in a different share than what the buyer owned.
I was hoping that someone that owned the stock might know if there's a way to correct that or if I end up paying tax to two countries, which would make me far less happy with my selection. Part of the learning curve I guess.
|
I did find this little "nugget" in an article just published discussing RDS's ability to continue to pay it's dividend!!
Market is concerned that higher dividend yield at the expense of low share prices will mean that the dividend is not sustainable and company may cut its dividend payment in the future. However,
Shell has not cut its dividends over the past 70 years. Even at oil below $10 per barrel, it maintained its dividend payments and has always given priority to its shareholders.
The Anglo-Dutch company is in a good position to finance its future projects while satisfying its investors. At the end of second quarter 2015, Shell’s gearing ratio was 12.7%, much better than other oil giants. Although the completion of the Shell-BG would require the oil company to raise its debt financing, it seems that the company would still be in a strong position to finance its dividends.