Shooting in Connecticut - Page 53 - Lateral-g Forums

intocarss · #**521** 02-06-2013, 07:49 AM

intocarss · #**522** 02-06-2013, 11:38 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F584p...ature=youtu.be

**GregWeld** · #**523** 02-07-2013, 08:25 AM

That's a good video! I forwarded it to a few folks I know that need some education.

Funny how the anti gun crowd will only argue that "nobody needs a gun"... but it's these same flower power folks that will march on anything that has to do with "rights". Pretty ironic.

Tony_SS · #**524** 02-07-2013, 10:09 AM

To anyone who is for 'gun control'... ask they HOW they will take the guns?

The ultimate answer they come to, is they'll use guys with 'guns' to take your guns.

They aren't for gun control, but authoritarian control of people who's agenda they don't agree with.

Bucketlist2012 · #**525** 02-07-2013, 10:27 AM

I watched Piers Morgan the other night just to get a perpective on his views..

He was at a Gun range, and he was shooting an Assaust style weapon.

He was talking about it's rate of fire, ect...That it is a Semi automatic weapon..

Then he goes and shoots it in full auto mode...

There is no way he was firing semi auto when the bursts of bullets were coming out 10 at a time...

I tried to see if he was going to be impartial, but his display of lying to the public continues...

realcoray · #**526** 02-07-2013, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bucketlist2012

I watched Piers Morgan the other night just to get a perpective on his views..

He was at a Gun range, and he was shooting an Assaust style weapon.

He was talking about it's rate of fire, ect...That it is a Semi automatic weapon..

Then he goes and shoots it in full auto mode...

There is no way he was firing semi auto when the bursts of bullets were coming out 10 at a time...

I tried to see if he was going to be impartial, but his display of lying to the public continues...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOUNvIwxSWg

These are completely legal, so while I don't know what he was using, it's definitely possible to have an absurd rate of fire without the weapon being considered 'full auto'.

Bucketlist2012 · #**527** 02-07-2013, 11:15 AM

Doesn't make sense to me...

It looks like a full auto weapon to me....

That is probably what he was firing..

Vince@Meanstreets · #**528** 02-07-2013, 11:32 AM

People that don't know squat about guns are going to class a perfectly legal semi sported with a military select fire AR-15. If you are going to try to fight something you would think you would at least educate yourself.

In an interview he asked, why do people need these semi automatic weapons of war that has the ability to spit out 100 rounds a second and kill thousands?

Vince@Meanstreets · #**529** 02-07-2013, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realcoray

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOUNvIwxSWg

These are completely legal, so while I don't know what he was using, it's definitely possible to have an absurd rate of fire without the weapon being considered 'full auto'.

Such a waste of money, also give anti's momentum. To me that's like doing donuts on Michelin pilot sports.

Tony_SS · #**530** 02-07-2013, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab

People that don't know squat about guns are going to class a perfectly legal semi sported with a military select fire AR-15. If you are going to try to fight something you would think you would at least educate yourself.

In an interview he asked, why do people need these semi automatic weapons of war that has the ability to spit out 100 rounds a second and kill thousands?

It's what liars do best.. They don't want to educate or be reasonable. They just want their political opponents unarmed.