...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Off Topic Forums
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #5831  
Old 10-27-2017, 09:40 AM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post

I think you have to have a period in your life where you really hunker down and stock it away to set yourself up and take advantage of that great magician, compound interest. I still think it's important to save a large chunk of your income every month. We save 15% of our gross income, personally. You can only do that if you live well below your means or increase your income to offset your expenses. We've done both.
I agree completely, and we have done much the same. Some of the things that have been said to me by friends during this move process have been interesting. One friend in particular has to have a brand new high end 3/4 ton 4x4 truck every few years...but said to me disparagingly "it must be nice to be able to retire and move West so young". He has spent more out of pocket money on just trucks the last 15 years than we did on the new house. BTW, I daily drive a 15 year old truck with 220,000 miles on it.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #5832  
Old 10-27-2017, 10:38 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 214 Times in 120 Posts
Default

It's the little tweaks that result in a major difference over time. Owning a car outright and investing the payment is a solid place to start for anyone.

I leased brand new BMW's and Audi's for nearly a decade at over $900 a month. That's over $100,000 in payments, not to mention the high insurance and registration costs. We woke up and smelled the coffee over 5 years ago and won't ever have a car payment again. I drive a 2007 Tundra with 117k on it. My wife has a 2015 Acura we bought certified.

But you can write off the car payment for business. Would you spend a dollar to get .25-.33 cents(tax bracket)? I used to be that bad at math too.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #5833  
Old 10-27-2017, 11:29 AM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
But you can write off the car payment for business. Would you spend a dollar to get .25-.33 cents(tax bracket)? I used to be that bad at math too.
Same with rental homes... "you can write off the depreciation and save a ton on taxes..." What they neglect to tell you is if you EVER sell the property, you reclaim all of said depreciation as regular income at whatever tax bracket you happen to be in at the time, and any extra gain is taxed as Capital Gains.

Everyone I know that got into the rental home racket has either claimed bankruptcy and lost them all or is still holding onto them and dealing with tenants daily because they can't afford to sell them.

This is where all of the accounting classes I took in school helped me to avoid certain investments...
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #5834  
Old 10-27-2017, 06:35 PM
CJD Automotive's Avatar
CJD Automotive CJD Automotive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 254
Thanks: 56
Thanked 203 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSLance View Post

Everyone I know that got into the rental home racket has either claimed bankruptcy and lost them all or is still holding onto them and dealing with tenants daily because they can't afford to sell them.

This is where all of the accounting classes I took in school helped me to avoid certain investments...
I have a few commercial and residential rentals/leases, and feel like they are solid investments. The trick is picking your target market. I will only buy 30-50K brick or block homes in "the not so good areas". Although I buy them outright, my strategy is they pay for themselves in 2.5-3 years. I invest very little in them for upkeep, pay little to nothing in taxes, and rent them through the section 8 program. I'm guaranteed my money, my tenants will never leave, and I get above average rent for the areas they are located.
__________________
Craig Scholl
CJD Automotive, LLC

www.CJDAUTOMOTIVE.com

"I own a Mopar, so I already know it won't be in stock, won't ship tomorrow, and won't actually fit without modification."
Reply With Quote
  #5835  
Old 10-27-2017, 06:57 PM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

That strategy is different than the "owning rentals for the tax break" strategy that was all the rage years ago. You are using the smallish investment to create monthly income and as long as you buy properly and keep expenses in check, it works fine.

If you were financing these homes and relying on the depreciation fa for to make them cash flow, the results are vastly different.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #5836  
Old 10-27-2017, 10:44 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 214 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I've had really good luck with real estate in Las Vegas and Phoenix, but there have been lucrative opportunities twice in 15 years.

While I'm building my new house, I'm living in home we rented for a few years to convert it to a primary residence. I will still need to pay taxes on the forced depreciation while it was rented, but I'll escape capital gains. My accountant said they probably wouldn't catch it, but I don't play games with the IRS. I pay what I owe them.

I do agree though, the forced depreciation really hurts if you hold long term. You get in a place where you are almost forced to 1031 exchange to avoid taxes. I wonder if the taxes must be paid on the depreciation when it's passed on to your estate?
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #5837  
Old 10-28-2017, 10:37 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
I've had really good luck with real estate in Las Vegas and Phoenix, but there have been lucrative opportunities twice in 15 years.

While I'm building my new house, I'm living in home we rented for a few years to convert it to a primary residence. I will still need to pay taxes on the forced depreciation while it was rented, but I'll escape capital gains. My accountant said they probably wouldn't catch it, but I don't play games with the IRS. I pay what I owe them.

I do agree though, the forced depreciation really hurts if you hold long term. You get in a place where you are almost forced to 1031 exchange to avoid taxes. I wonder if the taxes must be paid on the depreciation when it's passed on to your estate?



#1 -- the estate tax laws have changed dramatically in the last few years..... In MOST cases there are no estate taxes (they start at 5 million). If you set up a proper will - with trusts etc - then you can give your spouse 5MM - and your kids 5MM each etc - with no taxes. Of course there are complications to any and all tax planning strategies..... and only a professional in the field can guide you on that.


#2 -- Securities (stocks) assets are passed thru at the STEP UP value. I.e., the day they exchange hands (from dead guy to living guy) - the cost basis for the living guy is the value on that day (the day they pass hands).

However --- PROPERTY passed thru via an inheritance is taxed at the original cost basis. So if "Dad" paid $100,000 for the rental house in 1965 -- and you inherit it and then sell it asap.... you're paying taxes on the difference in value from $100K to what you sell it for. In other words -- there's no going back and having to recapture or pay taxes on Dad's deductions etc.
Reply With Quote
  #5838  
Old 10-28-2017, 11:29 AM
SSLance's Avatar
SSLance SSLance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 2,683
Thanks: 72
Thanked 338 Times in 212 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post

However --- PROPERTY passed thru via an inheritance is taxed at the original cost basis. So if "Dad" paid $100,000 for the rental house in 1965 -- and you inherit it and then sell it asap.... you're paying taxes on the difference in value from $100K to what you sell it for. In other words -- there's no going back and having to recapture or pay taxes on Dad's deductions etc.
I'm not sure that is 100% correct...probably based on how the "PROPERTY" is defined or classed before death.

I've always been taught that Death always accelerates basis if the transfer of property is direct. For example, if my Father owns a personal residence house and I am listed on the deed as TOD (Transfer on Death), when he passes away the property automatically becomes mine at current market value as a basis the day he passes away.

This is assuming my fathers entire estate is under the 5 mil cap as far as inheritance tax is concerned. If over that cap, pretty much everything changes.

Rental property that has been depreciated might have to be treated differently though. I wouldn't be shocked if either Capital Gains tax on the gain or Deprecation recapture income tax would need to be paid by the heirs if they ever sell the property.

I do know this, income producing property that has not been depreciated (ie: farmland with no equip or structures) passes thru to heirs at an accelerated basis.
__________________
Lance
1985 Monte Carlo SS Street Car
Reply With Quote
  #5839  
Old 10-28-2017, 07:42 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 214 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I do recall that if the beneficiary of the estate holds onto real estate for a certain amount of time, (Maybe a year?) the tax situation can change for the worse.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #5840  
Old 10-28-2017, 10:13 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,079 Times in 387 Posts
Default

RE: Inheriting depreciated rental property




You will not need to worry about past depreciation on your inherited property. You will just use your stepped up basis (FMV of property on date of inheritance) and this new basis will be used for depreciation. You will be able to depreciation these inherited assets in full over the property's useful life. For example, use the full 27.5 year, S/L for the rental house (less land) and the start date will be the date when the rental property was transferred to you.

For any prior capital improvements, these will be included in the stepped up basis on the inherited property so do not depreciate them separately.

For any appliances, since they are considered "new" to you, you will just use the new FMV of these items and depreciate them over the new useful life at the date the asset were transferred to you.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net