...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #721  
Old 12-04-2010, 10:07 AM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve68 View Post
Wow, thats a big difference in pics, and most likely the condition of tires!!!
^^Man, you said it. The proof is in the pictures. Awesome job Mark.
Look forward to your progress on the rear axle.
Reply With Quote
  #722  
Old 12-07-2010, 01:57 PM
Budweasel Budweasel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 73
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Dumb question for everyone

Not intended to highjack thread but I'm sure there are many novices, (like me), reading this build thread and some might have this question:

How would the elimination of the 4 point roll bar affect the chassis, (specifically first gen Camaro)?

I'm very interested to know if this is a must have to keep car from twisting. In your opinion, would it be useless to spend the money on subframe and aftermarket rear suspension and not add a roll bar?

I have two boys under 5 that I'd like to share this hobby with and would like to weigh out options. I'm 80% certain I'd rather be able to put them in the back seat without a roll bar versus having a two seat Camaro that gains the last x% of performance.
Reply With Quote
  #723  
Old 12-07-2010, 05:41 PM
conekiller13's Avatar
conekiller13 conekiller13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Budweasel View Post
Not intended to highjack thread but I'm sure there are many novices, (like me), reading this build thread and some might have this question:

How would the elimination of the 4 point roll bar affect the chassis, (specifically first gen Camaro)?

I'm very interested to know if this is a must have to keep car from twisting. In your opinion, would it be useless to spend the money on subframe and aftermarket rear suspension and not add a roll bar?

I have two boys under 5 that I'd like to share this hobby with and would like to weigh out options. I'm 80% certain I'd rather be able to put them in the back seat without a roll bar versus having a two seat Camaro that gains the last x% of performance.
You can always have a removable cross bar for the times you are street cruisin'.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #724  
Old 12-07-2010, 06:04 PM
bdahlg68's Avatar
bdahlg68 bdahlg68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 474
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Budweasel View Post
Not intended to highjack thread but I'm sure there are many novices, (like me), reading this build thread and some might have this question:

How would the elimination of the 4 point roll bar affect the chassis, (specifically first gen Camaro)?

I'm very interested to know if this is a must have to keep car from twisting. In your opinion, would it be useless to spend the money on subframe and aftermarket rear suspension and not add a roll bar?

I have two boys under 5 that I'd like to share this hobby with and would like to weigh out options. I'm 80% certain I'd rather be able to put them in the back seat without a roll bar versus having a two seat Camaro that gains the last x% of performance.
Or maybe you don't need 800 some odd ft-lbs of torque and therefore also not the cage?
Reply With Quote
  #725  
Old 12-07-2010, 06:12 PM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow View Post

I have my rear axle apart and I think I have a solution for my ABS fault issues. Once I get the parts made I'll share my design.

Stielow
very interested in this Mark - looking forward to seeing it
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty
Reply With Quote
  #726  
Old 12-08-2010, 08:21 AM
TonyHuntimer TonyHuntimer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow View Post
They strip them for $50. For assembled hose ends it may cost more due to the stainless steel pin in the fitting that can't be anodized. You will need to call them to get the details on hose ends. I only did adaptor fittings, trim rings, battery holders and knobs.

Mark
I know this is a really old post...but it's the first time I got to go through it. Did you know that you can simply buy all the fittings already black hard anodized from XRP?



Great build thread! The car looked and performed awesome out at OUSCI, but you don't need me to tell you that. I thought this car was named "The Hack"?

Tony Huntimer
RaceHome.com
__________________
http://www.testcardatabase.com
TestCarDatabase
Ex-Camaro Performers Magazine Columnist
Reply With Quote
  #727  
Old 12-17-2010, 01:06 PM
preston preston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 655
Thanks: 0
Thanked 34 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Did this car ever see a chassis dyno in the current tune ? Probably a dumb question because I can't imagine it hasn't been posted on this thread. Would be interesting to see the comparison to the engine dyno.

Good points about the engine and leaks. I thought I was the only one. Always finding little (and not so little drips) here and there. Always thought braided hoses and AN fittings were the bomb but now I"m finding that most of them end up leaking a bit too. Usually around the hose/joint interface, or I suspect on the swivel fittings maybe the swivel area, hard to say, you can clean it up and idle and driveway rev it all day long - no leaks. Street drive, mild leaks. Track drive - messy leaks. I couldn't afford it during buildup, but slowly I'm replacing my hand built hoses with pro-crimped style. Saves weight too.

With the latest artivcle from Hot Rod on the PTFE hoses I'm trying to figure out which ones are teflon as well. The Aeroquip startlite stuff is still rubber hose. My fuel is all teflon but its the old style stiff teflon stuff.

Anyway don't want to hijack into a hose topic, just letting you know I appreciate your excitement about a leak free motor.
Reply With Quote
  #728  
Old 03-01-2011, 04:49 PM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,523
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,296 Times in 619 Posts
Default Red Devil Update

I got some new wheels for Autoramma. They are from Formula 43 and made here in Detroit. Very nice wheels. www.formula43.com









Stielow
Reply With Quote
  #729  
Old 03-01-2011, 05:22 PM
BBC71Nova BBC71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I think you could put some chrome 30" spinners on it and it would still be bad a$$ .

What color red is that?

John
__________________
John
'71 Nova (Build thread)
FFR Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #730  
Old 03-01-2011, 05:37 PM
coolwelder62's Avatar
coolwelder62 coolwelder62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vinland Ks.
Posts: 4,315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow View Post
I got some new wheels for Autoramma. They are from Formula 43 and made here in Detroit. Very nice wheels. www.formula43.com









Stielow
Mark,Car look's great under the light's.Congrat's on the win at Optima. Scott M.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net