Bryce- The suspension geometry characteristics will be kept under wraps for now.. When we build the first prototype.. I will need to take the sub-frame over to friend of mine that will proof the suspension geometry before we move on to build final chassis.. Then the prototype will be put underneath my 68 Camaro to test & proof fit & function.. I will daily drive the car to ensure that we have meet our goals on design & function..
Two reason that drove me to build our own suspension.. 1st: build the car off the wheels.. 2nd :build the car to desired ride height without losing suspension travel.. Another thing that have become a big thing around the shop is weight.. The design on the sub with suspension has been designed to keep weight down.. I am a big fan of inter locking pcs. together & plug welding with stitch welding.. Our chassis is not designed to look pretty & smooth.. but the number one priority is strength .. Cost is another factor on the sub.. Look @ the upper control arm.. It is a mirrored from left to right.. so we build one arm that is used left & right.. The lower control arm is mirrored on components.. The control arms are using 4130 chromemoly tubes with 4140 upper bushing shafts.. We will be using all ARP fasteners.. We have tested the tensile strength on their fasteners.. & it is what they claim! We FEA tested the control arms with a 8000 pound load on them.. Plenty of strength!
The design on the spring buckets is just like GM would do on their trucks but with a coil over.. Shock angles is another key factor.. & the list keeps going on.. We have put a lot of thought into the design..
Please note that I am not doing this to produce & sell to the public.. Just to support the builds we have in house.. The suspension & chassis market is statured with vendors that produce excellent products..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce
Cris are going to share your suspension geometry characteristics?
Did you lose any weight with your design?
Nice detailed CAD work.
|