...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 12-08-2011, 03:40 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

You climb to the top of the heap for a reason. If you have the profits, take them as you see fit. It may piss off outsiders, investor, and employees, but it's their pony show. It's a free country. If you don't like it, get off the boat.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-08-2011, 04:04 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
You climb to the top of the heap for a reason. If you have the profits, take them as you see fit. It may piss off outsiders, investor, and employees, but it's their pony show. It's a free country. If you don't like it, get off the boat.
For purposes of my statement I was talking about publicly traded companies, not sole proprietors. Those profits (of public companies) belong to the investors since "they" are the actual owners of the company. A sole proprietor can get as much as he can, or is willing to take.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-08-2011, 04:50 PM
Etch Etch is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

From what I know, the OWS movement is more about corrupt politics than anything. This IMHO is a legitimate reason to be angry about.

I watched LAPD evict the protest members from Occupy LA. MYFOXLA was there interviewing the protesters, asking "what do you want to see change in Washington?" All the protesters answered something along the lines of "I want to see money out of Washington."

What does that mean? Money out of Washington?

Here are some examples of "money in Washington", and corrupt politics:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0LMAP0L5G4&noredirect=1
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kristi...b_1101433.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80Dbx...ature=youtu.be
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...mericans-face/

The real issues at hand is: Should big businesses be able to influence politics more than the average citizen?

Efficiency is a company's number one goal, it's how the government has set it up. But what happens when 'efficiency' oversteps people? The government needs to be changed.

Some objective data to look at: http://motherjones.com/politics/2011...ca-chart-graph

http://visualeconomics.creditloan.co...heir-paycheck/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ncome_equality
*note that we have the same income distribution as China...weird...


Now, I'll be the first to admit I don't know much of anything, I'm only 20, going to college... and I'm honestly kind of confused about this. Anyone older, with more experience care to let me know what these numbers actually mean?

P.S. Does anyone know about http://wikileaks.org/? Thoughts? What about the hacker group 'Anonymous'?

Last edited by Etch; 12-08-2011 at 06:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net