...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 12-30-2014, 08:45 AM
CraigS CraigS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

As the top link changes length that will change pinion angle. There is so much discussion about getting that angle correct, I wonder what the effect is of it changing every time the gas pedal moves. Educate me please.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 12-30-2014, 08:46 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
In all seriousness, the front of these old cars is usually the major weakness, not the back. I think this is great to maximize your rear dynamics but you better make the carpet match the drapes.
Yup!

__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 12-30-2014, 11:06 AM
gerno's Avatar
gerno gerno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 526
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

What's the plan to laterally locate the axle. I assume a Watts. Do you have any pics of this piece and how it sits within the total rear package?
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 12-30-2014, 11:36 AM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

You sure about that? Payton thought the same thing....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron in SoCal View Post
It's got a JRS designed C6 suspension with fabricated frame rails. Came out pretty good.








__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 12-30-2014, 11:57 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Hi Craig !

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS View Post
As the top link changes length that will change pinion angle. There is so much discussion about getting that angle correct, I wonder what the effect is of it changing every time the gas pedal moves. Educate me please.


First, just a reminder that this is a track car, not a cruiser.

We run just enough static negative pinion angle that the driveline & pinion yoke are in line under hard acceleration ... which is always the goal with performance & race cars. The amount of static negative pinion angle required varies with each torque absorber application, but they are all in the 3°-5° range.



__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 12-30-2014, 12:00 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Hi Steve!

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerno View Post
What's the plan to laterally locate the axle. I assume a Watts. Do you have any pics of this piece and how it sits within the total rear package?

It will be a very trick watts link set-up with 6" of roll center adjustment. Photos will come when Mike Tolle is installing it.



__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 12-30-2014, 02:06 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I thought I read this here in this thread, but I can't locate it at the moment... You (Ron) mentioned doing a rear axle with a 13" high upper link from the axle centerline. Looking at the side view of the axle being built here, based on these angles, that would go right through the crossmember for the rear coilovers. How do you deal with that?

Related question... If you draw a straight line between the upper and lower link mount points, it doesn't pass through the centerline of the rear axle. Why is this? Is there a specific reason that the 2 are located that way (behind the axle centerline)?

So many questions, I know... I am loving learning about these details, so thanx as always for sharing so generously!
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 12-30-2014, 02:08 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
Technically they are considered parallel lower links, but they are a smidge (1/8" each side) narrower in the front. This is to insure the outside lower link is never pushing the rear end towards the outside of the corner, under acceleration.

Got it... Thanx!
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 12-30-2014, 02:18 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron in SoCal View Post
It's got a JRS designed C6 suspension with fabricated frame rails. Came out pretty good.
Did I read that you are looking at relocating the UCA mount points? Given how Jake builds these mounts, there is a bit of room to move the mount if you fill in the existing holes.

Also, adjusting caster and camber was relatively easy with this setup. Jake set mine up and machined spacers from 1" stock for the initial alignment. Eric and I used shims to adjust the alignment until we got to the point we wanted (based on Ron's specs), then Eric just machined a new set of spacers to those thicknesses. Worked out pretty well.

While I hate reading the story of Payton's project with Jake, I will say that the measurements on my subframe from Jake were pretty spot on when I recorded them for Ron. At least as accurate as I could measure them. Ron and I never discussed moving the UCA mounts, although I didn't present that as an option (and wouldn't really want to at this stage unless it would make a dramatic difference). Ron has all of my numbers along with one other JRS subframe I think, so I'm sure he will suggest the best changes as appropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 12-30-2014, 11:40 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post

You sure about that? Payton thought the same thing....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron in SoCal View Post
It's got a JRS designed C6 suspension with fabricated frame rails. Came out pretty good.



I guess it's a good thing we got it out of Jakes before he got in deeper.

It still seems with the Sutton designed offset three link with adjustable on the fly instant center and roll center out back and Jakes stuff up front the carpet won't match the drapes.

__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171


Last edited by FETorino; 12-30-2014 at 11:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net