...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-22-2008, 11:58 PM
Grimlad Grimlad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 17x9.5's front/rear - regarding performance

Are there any negatives to performance if I run 17x9.5" wheels on both front and rear for a '71 Chevelle?

Will they fit without modifications?

I plan on upgrading both front and rear suspension components (through SC&C) and don't want to work against the improved geometry/performance. I plan to slowly start using her for a daily driver and want the ease of rotation and spare storage (that's mainly why no staggered setup). I like that extra width for the slightly more aggressive look. Or should I go with 8's?

Any suggestions on tire setup and possible adjustments (offset and such)?

Thanks,
Sean
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2008, 01:15 AM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 87 Times in 34 Posts
Default

No problems running 9.5 wide front and rear. You'll need about 5.5" of backspacing. You can easily run 275/40 on all 4 corners.

Don't go 8" wide, they're too narrow IMO on a 68-72 A-body and just look tiny. Been there, done that, sold them.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2008, 04:24 PM
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
buickfunnycar.com buickfunnycar.com is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monterey Peninsula,CA
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blown353 View Post

Don't go 8" wide, they're too narrow IMO on a 68-72 A-body and just look tiny. Been there, done that, sold them.
X2....ha ha.
__________________
'67 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 Hot Rod featured car
World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car!

www.buickfunnycar.com
http://www.facebook.com/ingenuebuickfunnycar
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2008, 09:53 PM
Grimlad Grimlad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies!

That's what I would like to do, either 17x9" or 17x9.5" all around for a part-time daily driver (mostly for ease of rotation, spares, etc.). I have been told that bigger than 17x8" would cause suspension flex or movement, if the backspacing and setup wasn't perfect (and I definitely don't want that, especially after big money in suspension upgrades soon to come).

What other things should I know/do to setup 9.5's (or 9's) for a '71 Chevelle and not compromise suspension performance (5.5" bs and 275/40 on all 4 corners I got - thanks, blown353)? Anybody have either setup on an A-body?

Thanks again,
Sean
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net