...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2009, 09:34 AM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 119
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Default 3/4 Frame for first gen?

Hey all, just something for people to discuss, like or dislike. I just finished up my frame yesterday. It took a lot of engineering and re-engineering, and the photos really don't do it justice. This spring I found cracks and buckling in the floor under the rear seat, even w/ bolt in connectors. I looked @ weld ins and while the DSE's looked great, I wanted to be able to unbolt the car yet if ever necessary, so here is my version. Main rails are 2x3x.12 and the whole unit is under 40lbs. (just simple 1X2 bolt ins are 15) The whole thing is welded to the stock stub and will roll under the car and bolt right up.

Now it's crunch time cuz I want to be @Joliet for the GG show in Sep.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56

Last edited by Tinker; 05-28-2016 at 07:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2009, 10:41 AM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,893
Thanks: 1,105
Thanked 486 Times in 268 Posts
Default

Sounds like a good idea but it looks like you gave up a couple of inches of ground clearance. Hard to tell from the pic but it looks like it. I think that is the advantage of the DSE connectors, they don't sit low.

Maybe you could channel the floor so the rails could sit higher but still allow it to be removed.

Looking forward to some pictures of it installed.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2009, 11:12 AM
freebird freebird is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: brockway,pa
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I like it. Can you give better pics of the rear crossmember? did you make it or was it something purchased?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2009, 06:59 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 119
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Default

I fabbed the rear crossmember myself, the center arc was make from four pieces welded together the rest is 2x2 tubing. I probably have over 8 hours on that piece itself. The whole frame fits nice and tight, thats why it took so long to build. As far as ground clearance, I am giving up some, but they are 1/8 inch from floor pan, and the mufflers sit 1/4 inch lower anyway. My old leafs w/ lift bars sat 3" lower, so I'm actually going to be better.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2009, 12:13 PM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

What are you going to do about the rear rails? Those are only .045" thick 2x3 open channel "rails".
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2009, 10:15 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 119
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Default

I am running the stock rear framerails. I do have the airbar 4-link setup, so there are twin crossbars on the cradle that will hopefully strengthen things up. Plus with the four link the rear 18 inches or so are not a direct stress member. Is there some better idea short of installing new rails or basically back halving it? I am doing more to this car than before, but it's still too nice to completely chop up.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2009, 11:56 PM
JRouche JRouche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ventura County
Posts: 253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
Hey all, just something for people to discuss, like or dislike.
Great welding. looks good.

Ok, only cause you asked. Just curious on a couple spots. Why lay the 2x3" tube down instead of putting it vertical. For room? May be stronger vertical. I see some flexing there.

That is a pretty long length from the rear tube of the latice to the rear cross member. I see that piece taking ALOT of load and possibly flexing. And cross bracing doesnt help much for torsional stiffness but Im wondering if the cross bars (lattice) were brought all the way back to that rear cross member if it wouldnt help. And if you thought it would help, no need to change anything. Maybe just add another lattice to fill that gap I see. Just rear of the lattice you have to the cross member.

Ok, what I do like!! The welding looks great. I really like how you tied the frame into the original frame. Id love to see some closer pics of that. Looks like you spent alot of time and thought on that.

It looks good, just the far rear section looks a lil needy IMO. JR
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2009, 12:02 AM
nvr2fst nvr2fst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,023
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hello Cris,
I see you have your hands full. Great start. I originally planned on doing something similiar, but channeling the subframe into the body, extending the subframe just a tick past the firewall and turn radius into the rockers. The rockers of course were to be redone utilizing them as part of the chassis for ridid strength. I may still have some photos from the initial cutout and mock up to help you out. Where are you located in WI. Im in Delafield.
PM me any time if I can help you out.
Dave

Last edited by nvr2fst; 08-04-2009 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-04-2009, 12:37 AM
camaro2nv's Avatar
camaro2nv camaro2nv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Roseville
Posts: 687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver69Camaro View Post
What are you going to do about the rear rails? Those are only .045" thick 2x3 open channel "rails".
Run the Morrison clip.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-05-2009, 07:34 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 119
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Hey thanks for all your input. I knew I could get some opinions on both sides of the fence. For now, this is it and we'll see how it holds. I did do a lot of laying under the car and thinking. The tube is layed down to match the original rails and maximum clearance. I could put more bracing, but the exhaust is in the way. There is only 12" from the lattice to the rear crossmember. I am hoping the fact that the lattice follows the drop in the main rails adds a third dimension in the frame. Just bouncing on one corner sure seems to have stiffened the torsional capabilities of the frame. Anyway, it is time to put 'er back together. Thanks for all the input maybe my next car will have a full frame and cage, cuz I sure enjoyed this bit of fabrication and by looking at some of your rides, overkill isn't in any of our vocabularies.
Keep an eye open for updates in the new members rides posts.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net