...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2005, 06:57 PM
62fairlane 62fairlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: so. ILL
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default tubing size for a-arms?

ok I need to order tubing for my a-arms by the end of the week. I am getting some 4130 chrome moly tubing from wicksaircraft.com (local place) but I need to select a tubing size still. the arms are about 16" long with an air bag mounted on them. would some 1.25"x .090" tubing be too overkill? this is on a daily driver so pothole durability ranks higher then weight savings right now....but I won't want to TOTALLY overbuild the setup. I was even thinking of something as large as 1.375"x.090" tubing.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2005, 01:40 AM
Matt@Lateral Dynamics Matt@Lateral Dynamics is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Paradise, Ca
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You're likely to not get an answer to your question because you're asking someone to engineer a load bearing weldment that will be subjected to some nasty vibration and shock loads, as well as having a probable finite cycle life. If someone did suggest a tube size, they have no control over (no offense meant here) the quality of the welds nor the overall design.

If it failed, no matter the failure mode, the person that gave you advice could, in reality, be held partially at fault for the failure and any resulting property damage or even loss of life. As a matter of fact, I would urge anyone to avoid answering this question, or questions like it unless they have the proper insurance coverage for the situation.

Sorry dude...blame the lawyers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2005, 01:44 AM
62fairlane 62fairlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: so. ILL
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

ok maybe then as a better question....

what tubing sizes are used on commerically available arms?

PS...sorry $1 stag beer night nextdoor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2005, 10:24 AM
Ricochet's Avatar
Ricochet Ricochet is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 2,401
Thanks: 298
Thanked 362 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Jim Meyer Racing has built the last 2 chassis' for me. On his design he used 1" upper & 1.25 lower. But he used mild steel DOM rather than chromoly. I have been told not to use chromoly on the street for building chasiss for a few reasons, but not sure on control arms. This is a little out of my league as to the true reasons not to. That's why I leave it to the people that know when it comes down to stuff like this!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2005, 10:35 AM
62fairlane 62fairlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: so. ILL
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

could anyone else chimein on this? I could se the CM not being used since it is stiffer and would be a rougher ride than the mild. Part of the thing is that I am graduating with my under grad in mechanical engineering but none of the professors around here know anything about this kind of a situation. I have the knowledge to do the FEA on it but just don't know what kind of loading I am loking at IE is a 10,000 lb force along the cars axis enough to simulate a pothole pushing the wheel back? what about vertical forces?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:01 AM
TravisB TravisB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NW arkansas
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Air Ride tech control arms are 1in DOM
__________________
Kenny Davis Hot Rods
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:48 AM
62fairlane 62fairlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: so. ILL
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

well what wall thickness? I was looking at going to a larger diameter tube with a thinner wall maybe.....but the wall thickness is the most important part
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2005, 12:05 PM
TravisB TravisB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NW arkansas
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62fairlane
well what wall thickness? I was looking at going to a larger diameter tube with a thinner wall maybe.....but the wall thickness is the most important part
just looked in the book .219 wall thickness
__________________
Kenny Davis Hot Rods
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2005, 12:10 PM
62fairlane 62fairlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: so. ILL
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

so what is the problem with 4130 tubing? just by changing to that I could cut the wall thickness in half.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-17-2005, 12:24 PM
TravisB TravisB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NW arkansas
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 62fairlane
so what is the problem with 4130 tubing? just by changing to that I could cut the wall thickness in half.
I don't know that there is a problem with chrome moly...maybe companies don't use it because it is more expensive!
__________________
Kenny Davis Hot Rods
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net