...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:12 AM
Steven's 72's Avatar
Steven's 72 Steven's 72 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Qa1's on stock camaro subframe Question?

Can you put Qa1's on a stock 67 camaro subframe with stock A arms or are their modifications required?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2012, 10:01 AM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

The QA-1's are larger in diameter than the shock insertion hole in the stock lower arms. The correct way to do it would be to remove your lower arms, cut the shock insertion hole larger in diameter, and then weld a nut on each side of the control arm. You will need to weld the nuts because once you've made the shock insertion hole bigger you will have intruded on the existing lower shock mount holes.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-18-2012, 10:14 AM
Steven's 72's Avatar
Steven's 72 Steven's 72 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the info..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:07 AM
Steven's 72's Avatar
Steven's 72 Steven's 72 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Just curious are their any other coil-overs that can be used without modifications, or are they all the same?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2012, 05:57 AM
Rick Dorion's Avatar
Rick Dorion Rick Dorion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Accord, NY
Posts: 587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Why can't you drop the LCA, put the coil over in and bolt the lower t-bar to the top of the LCA?
__________________
69 Camaro therapy program, 410, M22! SOLD
68 Camaro - SOLD
67 Bel Air - Hmmm.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2012, 08:58 AM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I'm was under the impression he asking about the shock alone. He didn't mention coil over shock. If he is talking coil over shock set uo I couldn't answer that one.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-19-2012, 09:26 AM
intocarss's Avatar
intocarss intocarss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal in the Sfv
Posts: 4,257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
The QA-1's are larger in diameter than the shock insertion hole in the stock lower arms. The correct way to do it would be to remove your lower arms, cut the shock insertion hole larger in diameter, and then weld a nut on each side of the control arm. You will need to weld the nuts because once you've made the shock insertion hole bigger you will have intruded on the existing lower shock mount holes.
This is how they did it to my car
__________________
If it ain't buckin, chirpin & makin all kinds of bad noises, then I ain't happy

Accelerating is optional...........stopping is mandatory. Your car WILL stop one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-19-2012, 10:46 AM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 743
Thanks: 10
Thanked 56 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Given that we're talking about a very critical suspension component here...I would hesitate to bolt a coil-over to the stock LCA. My concern would be the ability of that 40 year old piece of metal being able to handle the entire load being applied in a relatively small area. With the conventional spring setup, the load is distributed across a wider area of the LCA, in an area by the way, which was designed for that load.

Personally, I would go with an aftermarket LCA designed for coilovers...SPC, Speedtech, Ridetech, etc.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-19-2012, 11:38 AM
Rick Dorion's Avatar
Rick Dorion Rick Dorion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Accord, NY
Posts: 587
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Good point. I'm at a crossroads myself. One mfr said to use the stock lca. Anyway, if we're talking about the regular shock, I had the same large diameter issue with a set of DA Varishocks. I mounted them on top of the lca so I wouldn't have to modify the lower arm. However I found the body large enough that I needed to enlarge to frame pocket the shock goes up into. On compression, it would have hit. Loved my die grinder.
__________________
69 Camaro therapy program, 410, M22! SOLD
68 Camaro - SOLD
67 Bel Air - Hmmm.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2012, 10:19 AM
MIKE@RIDETECH's Avatar
MIKE@RIDETECH MIKE@RIDETECH is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

*I was previously incorrect about our coilovers being a match. We do not recommend running a coil over with the stock arm due to the strength of lower shock mount and how short of stroke would be required.

We do have our new smooth body shocks for the guys that will be running just a stock or performance spring upgrade. The smooth body still has the performance valving in a mono tube shock. But the exterior is designed to fit through the stock shock mounting hole.
__________________

Last edited by MIKE@RIDETECH; 11-20-2012 at 02:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net