...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2023, 10:35 AM
68454RS's Avatar
68454RS 68454RS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Huntington Indiana
Posts: 288
Thanks: 227
Thanked 227 Times in 114 Posts
Default 3 link vs triangulated 4 link - Why is one better?

I know this has been discussed before, many times BUT, talking performance only, not cost, not installation, just performance, triangulated not lateral 4 link.
... I keep hearing the 3 link is so much better than a triangulated 4 link for auto-x performance and I don't understand why. If you take both set-ups and add the ridetech "R" joints on all ends, you would not have any binding, IMO, So,

4 link with all ridetech "R" joints
3 link with all ridetech "R joints

The 4 link would not have any binding, correct?
The 4 link would control any side to side movement, correct?

The 3 link would allow the rear to move side to side slightly with articulation due to the track bar, correct?

So what makes one better than the other?

I did put the complete Ridetech R joint kit in my Camaro and the articulation was just as Brett showed it in his R joint videos. My FFR 33 has the option of doing either and already has the 3 link bracketry if I want to go that route. I already have all the 4 link set up with all R joints. Remember that money is not the consideration here, strictly performance. What would I gain going to a 3 link?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2023, 10:38 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 120
Thanked 92 Times in 56 Posts
Default

To do a proper 3 link you need more room for the upper link. Triangulated 4 links are good when there are space constraints. The shorter the upper links are( triangulated 4 link), the more your rear axle will "roll" and change pinion angle. The more travel, the worse this gets. An upper link closer in length to the lower links minimizes pinion angle change, but say goodbye to a back seat in an oem car.

Not only does the axle roll, but it will also somewhat induce rear steer in the axle housing in turning situations. One side of the car goes up, and one side goes down, shortening the wheelbase on one side, and lengthening the wheelbase on the other thus inducing rear steer. Properly engineered and adjusted systems will minimize these effects, but they still exist to some degree. The 3 link with panhard bar or watts link also is very simple to adjust rear roll center height. Are you racing it? Will you be tweaking on it during track days or autocross?

Just my .02.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tinker For This Useful Post:
camcojb (03-20-2023)
  #3  
Old 03-21-2023, 09:17 AM
68454RS's Avatar
68454RS 68454RS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Huntington Indiana
Posts: 288
Thanks: 227
Thanked 227 Times in 114 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinker View Post
To do a proper 3 link you need more room for the upper link. Triangulated 4 links are good when there are space constraints. The shorter the upper links are( triangulated 4 link), the more your rear axle will "roll" and change pinion angle. The more travel, the worse this gets. An upper link closer in length to the lower links minimizes pinion angle change, but say goodbye to a back seat in an oem car.

Not only does the axle roll, but it will also somewhat induce rear steer in the axle housing in turning situations. One side of the car goes up, and one side goes down, shortening the wheelbase on one side, and lengthening the wheelbase on the other thus inducing rear steer. Properly engineered and adjusted systems will minimize these effects, but they still exist to some degree. The 3 link with panhard bar or watts link also is very simple to adjust rear roll center height. Are you racing it? Will you be tweaking on it during track days or autocross?

Just my .02.
I'll probably do some Auto-x but just for fun.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2023, 12:29 PM
Panteracer's Avatar
Panteracer Panteracer is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,141
Thanks: 1
Thanked 173 Times in 86 Posts
Default 3 link vs 4 link

So my question is a torque arm an inverted 3 link
with a way longer arm??

I was looking at Art Morrison 3 link but upper arm looks short
vs a torque arm

Want to build a gutted street legal car with no rules compliance
or care about rear seat etc

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2023, 01:20 PM
Tinker's Avatar
Tinker Tinker is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 278
Thanks: 120
Thanked 92 Times in 56 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panteracer View Post
So my question is a torque arm an inverted 3 link
with a way longer arm??

I was looking at Art Morrison 3 link but upper arm looks short
vs a torque arm

Want to build a gutted street legal car with no rules compliance
or care about rear seat etc

Bob
I was wondering how quick the torque arm would show up. Lol
That would be a great question for Blake, but haven't heard a peep from him in a long time.
__________________
Chris
1969 Firebird: injected Pontiac 462ci, T56
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2023, 03:47 PM
Panteracer's Avatar
Panteracer Panteracer is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 1,141
Thanks: 1
Thanked 173 Times in 86 Posts
Default 3 link vs 4 link

I plan on going to good guys this weekend and
finally enjoy one.. no selling and no racing
I plan on talking to speedtech and others if
any they are there...been doing a lot of research
on line... had a ridetech 4 link and speedtech front but their early A-arms
only on another car.

I am pretty much sold on the Speedtech Extreme
front clip but still toying with torque arm vs 3 link
Maier a few years back stated Torque arm was
better than the 4 link with short arms...

Again Roadster shop full chassis is cool because you
can really set the car low.. my floor is mostly cut up
so that does not matter to me if I remove it

Car will be fully caged so that will help with some things

Bob
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net