...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-05-2017, 10:51 PM
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro's Avatar
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Posts: 130
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Default Remote oil filter location, any suggestions should be great.

I'm building a 1970 Camaro and I'm running an ATS oil pan with remote oil filter. I've been all over the car and so far have only been able to fit it on the drivers side radiator support. It seems like the shortest, most secure spot I can find.

Would there be any down side, to me mounting it here??

Any comments would be great!

Thanks,

Sandro
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro; 03-06-2017 at 01:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-2017, 02:28 AM
72Z/28's Avatar
72Z/28 72Z/28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 371
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default

I would suggest referring to Blake or Ben at Speedtech Performance . Their oil pan comes with remote oil filter kit and have seen them installed in a different location.
__________________
72 Camaro RS:SOLD
68 Camaro:
LS6 Engine,Tremec TKO 600,5 Speed
Complete Speedtech Subframe Kit,Speedtech Torque Arm, 9" Rearend from Strange, Wilwood Brakes, Minitubbed, Hotchkis Subframe Connectors, FIKSE FM5s
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2017, 04:10 AM
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro's Avatar
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Posts: 130
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72Z/28 View Post
I would suggest referring to Blake or Ben at Speedtech Performance . Their oil pan comes with remote oil filter kit and have seen them installed in a different location.
I actually know them pretty good! I spoke with Rodger at speed tech and they usually install their remote oil on the front portion of the drivers side frame rail. Im running the stock sub frame so my steering assembly and sway bar takes up that whole area.

I was concerned with how far and the height of my location compared to the motor. I know its always best to keep it closer to the motor, but on my car it will be really hard to locate it elsewhere. I'm hoping there's no reason I can't keep it there.

Thanks, Sandro
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2017, 12:15 AM
Brewtal66 Brewtal66 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Moreno valley, CA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

My only thought is that every time you change the filter it's going to make a mess. That would be my biggest concern when doing a remote mount.
__________________
Tim King
Editor, Lateral-G
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2017, 01:05 AM
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro's Avatar
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Posts: 130
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewtal66 View Post
My only thought is that every time you change the filter it's going to make a mess. That would be my biggest concern when doing a remote mount.
Yeah, I had the same though. Lol
If I put it there I'll make sure I leave enough room to put a rug under it when I change the oil filter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2017, 06:39 AM
72Z/28's Avatar
72Z/28 72Z/28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 371
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewtal66 View Post
My only thought is that every time you change the filter it's going to make a mess. That would be my biggest concern when doing a remote mount.
That was the main reason for getting rid of my Milodon oil pan and going with Autokraft oil pan which has spin on type oil filter. Besides, you would get rid of extra plumbing required for the remote oil filter.
__________________
72 Camaro RS:SOLD
68 Camaro:
LS6 Engine,Tremec TKO 600,5 Speed
Complete Speedtech Subframe Kit,Speedtech Torque Arm, 9" Rearend from Strange, Wilwood Brakes, Minitubbed, Hotchkis Subframe Connectors, FIKSE FM5s
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-07-2017, 11:29 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

what about on the outside of the frame horn up by the bumper bracket. i think keeping it low would be better.
plus easier to drain with less mess.
maybe cut a hole in the inner fender to mount it high enough for the hoses to come over the top of the frame and into the filter mount.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2017, 11:52 AM
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro's Avatar
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Posts: 130
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Foster View Post
what about on the outside of the frame horn up by the bumper bracket. i think keeping it low would be better.
plus easier to drain with less mess.
maybe cut a hole in the inner fender to mount it high enough for the hoses to come over the top of the frame and into the filter mount.
Thank Blake, that's a good Idea, I'll have to check that out!

Have you seen the weather we're getting here, it's still snowing and its March. I'm sure you guys aren't missing the snow and rain
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2017, 05:01 PM
Corey R. Corey R. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 57
Thanks: 22
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I have the ATS pan as well, and while it is an extremely beautiful piece, I am not comfortable with the idea of the extra complexity involved with the remote mount filter.

I am considering swapping to the MAST pan, which appears to work, on paper at least, with my 4 inch crank and Holley swap components.

Are there any advantages the ATS pan offers over other options on the market to make it work keeping?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-07-2017, 07:57 PM
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro's Avatar
Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro Sandro's 1969 502 Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, B.C., Canada
Posts: 130
Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey R. View Post
I have the ATS pan as well, and while it is an extremely beautiful piece, I am not comfortable with the idea of the extra complexity involved with the remote mount filter.

I am considering swapping to the MAST pan, which appears to work, on paper at least, with my 4 inch crank and Holley swap components.

Are there any advantages the ATS pan offers over other options on the market to make it work keeping?
Good question? I'm sure Blake could asnswer that one!
I'm way to ivestened turn back now. I don't mind the extra plumbing, just trying to find a spot that doesn't look like an after thought.

I tried what Blake's suggested. I would have to make a mounting Bracket of some sort. I'll just keep looking at it, till makes sense.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net