The “Donovan” is a seasoned standard deck aluminum BBC block that came out of a “grudge” dragster and made just over 1,000 horsepower naturally aspired in that form (14.5-1 compression and 14 degree big chief heads and matching intake.) The owner has opted to go to bigger cid therefore requiring a taller block. I do not want a long stroke and preferred a destroker for many reasons. It has a Lunati internally balanced crankshaft and appropriate con-rods. I am having the pistons replaced to reduce the CR to 7-1 to allow high levels of boosting and the option of retarding the ignition for pump gas. I’m in the chemical business and the port tank will have 93 unleaded pump gas and the starboard will have 114 octane racing gas. I will be adding a water/alcohol injector and the setup has water to air intercoolers.
I am new to boats and do not intend to do serious racing. I already have the fastest boat around – meaning the next fastest are hot jet bikes or no hot boats around. The motor in it now is an iron 468 with 12.5-1 compression, a moderate roller cam, headers, and 820 double pumper. I know nothing about tuning a hull or why that is done. I doubt I’ll ever look for the other side of 100 mph and rarely much past 80. So basically the only person I race is myself so to speak and it is about acceleration and not top speed. I asked Berkeley to pick out the best upgrades and those seem obvious other than for them to pick the correct size stainless impeller and water pickup grate.
The water around her (Florida Natural Coast) is very unpredictable due to it being very shallow (on average 2-4 for miles) with slightly deeper channels that the prop boats run in. Those can appear fast around an island within seconds and my Sanger Texas tunnel hull is not suited for waves and wakes. More than a few times at relatively slow speeds I’ve gone bouncing from wake top to wake top and less times had a wake roll across the bow and into my lap (doesn’t really have one).
I appreciate your imput. Losing weight is almost as important to me as gaining power – why the mega bucks to go aluminum on the block. Other weight lowering parts include mini-alternator, mini-starter, alloy brackets, dry cell batteries etc. I have three 4 bolt main bbc motors. An old school L88 worked up in old ways in a semi-modified V 19 footer my wife drives, a 340 hp Mercruiser “crusader” and the 468 cid currently in my boat. Adding a blower, turbos and intercooler adds weight. I hope to offset that by going to an aluminum block and heads and the other weight reduction changes.
Dumping my Donovan block to order a complete turbo motor from someone isn’t a viable idea nor do I want an iron motor even if it put out 2,000 horsepower. I’ve had a Porsche 928 (V-8 model) that had a turbo and TECIII engine management with aftermarket sequential F.I. and it was the fastest street legal car I ever drove, but fuel injection and computers are outside of my learning curve right now. First I need this motor together.
My goal isn’t merely acceleration, but the appearance of speed – the eye candy value. Putting 15-20 psi into a 475 that can turn 8500 rpms is going to make horsepower. More than I can use. But how does it look? Twin turbos blowing into an old school rootes blower will look impressive. That matters to me.
I’ve told the fella (a pro dragster engine builder) to go ahead and put on the air flow 14 degree heads with titanium intake valves. Temporarily I’ll run the old Gale Banks twin turbos (draw thru setup) into the high rise intake matched to those heads. I’m confident the old Rayjay turbos will need swapping out. And then watch for one of those ungodly costly used magnesium blower manifolds that will go with those heads and a rebuildable 1471 magnesium blower. Since I don’t know jack, let
the engine builder build the motor how he sees best and then add bolt-ons.
After all, its just money.
It sounds like my $20K motor project just became a $30K project and that is budget used/rebuildable parts for much of that. I have an old wet direct port nitrous oxide injection system somewhere (I have lots of old stuff like some old Mercruiser whipple twin screw/intercooler setup and FI intake. (I think they made it out of lead). Sinking $60K after Berkeley gets it’s cut into a ’79 boat seems wacko but for the first time in my life I can afford it and speed on the street is worthless – as in unusable.
The tech stuff (fuel injection and computer engine management) is going to have to wait.
WHAT ARE THE DANGERS OF MY OLD FIBERGLASS TUNNEL HULL in the below 100 mph range? I’ve run it 70ish noticing no bad traits. Flexes notably if I come down off the air hard on a wave/wake. Never knew a boat that didn’t. I know exactly NOTHING about that topic or even where to look.
PS… picked up a second Sanger Texas tunnel hull to put the wife’s hot iron L88 427 in it, probably a 475-500 hp motor. She particularly is concerned of appearance instead of performance so the painting money goes into her’s. Mine already has the $8k paint job, though aged.
Sorry to ramble on. My last actually building motors was in L88s were the hot rat motor and the best I could afford was the small port L68s WAY BACK WHEN. Build my first one in my college apartment around 1973 with a Vette 3 duce setup on it.
Give an old guy a little bit of money, ancient knowledge and a fantasy he's actually pursuing. Sounds dangerous. Steer a wide berth!