...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2014, 03:33 AM
ONROADYNO's Avatar
ONROADYNO ONROADYNO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Clean sheet front suspension design help

I am planning to make a front chassis with C6 uprights and control arms for a 1971 - 74 Australian GM car. 60" track.
The chassis is very similar to the same year Chevelle.

I would just like to check if my mental process is correct.

1: Find out what is the factory offset is for rims (C6).
2: Place rim/tire in desired location
3: Bolt up hub and control arms
4: Make bottom control arms parallel to the ground
5: Position top arm for correct camber gain... ( how do I do this please )
6: Make mounting points for suspension and chassis rails (as wide as possible)

Thankyou

Last edited by ONROADYNO; 02-12-2014 at 03:33 AM. Reason: grammar
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2014, 03:35 AM
ONROADYNO's Avatar
ONROADYNO ONROADYNO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ONROADYNO View Post
I am planning to make a front chassis with C6 uprights and control arms for a 1971 - 74 Australian GM car. 60" track.
The chassis is very similar to the same year Chevelle.

I would just like to check if my mental process is correct.

1: Find out what is the factory offset is for rims (C6).
2: Place rim/tire in desired location
3: Bolt up hub and control arms
4: Make bottom control arms parallel to the ground
5: Position top arm for correct camber gain... ( how do I do this please )
6: Make mounting points for suspension and chassis rails (as wide as possible)

Thankyou
Function before form
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2014, 01:44 PM
crazycarl's Avatar
crazycarl crazycarl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey there,
Please take what I say in a conversational tone; it is not meant to chastise or attack.

What you are proposing is not a 'clean sheet' design. You are starting with existing compeonts which introduce their own set of limitations requiring certain compromises. Also, if you don't have the knowledge to answer #5 then you may want to reconsider your plan to design something from scratch. Building a front suspension is not like building a pair of ladder bars.

- Compromises -
C6 spindle is designed for a front-mid engine vehicle. The rack needs to be relocated so it doesn't end up in the middle of the block. Then you need to cut off the steering arms and relocate them. If the new arms place the tie-rod in the wrong location in 3D by even a small amount, like 1/16th", then the car can have issues with ackerman and bump steer.

Corvette control arms are extremely long and will make building headers a huge pain.

The Corvette has a 'parabolic' front spring which also assists as an anti-roll device. If you try to use a stock Corvette lower arm with coilovers the car will have a digressive motion ratio. That means the car will need a HUGE anti-roll bar to keep it from trying to roll over in corners.

So, take all these things into consideration. Just some free thoughts.

Good luck with your project.
__________________
I'm probably just screwing with you, so please don't take it personal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2014, 07:30 PM
ONROADYNO's Avatar
ONROADYNO ONROADYNO is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Thankyou

I appreciate your valuable input.
I am trying to learn twice & build once (mark twice & cut once).

Basically I would like to (try) to put 315 tires on the front.
I thought C6 would have the best load carry capacity bearing.

In Australian modifications laws it is permissible to retro fit factory manufactured components.
Fabricated control arms would have to be tested at a cost that out ways the conversion.
Ideally a DSE X subframe assembly would be ideal but besides control arm problems in approval the welding in of a stub is frowned on.

I take all input as constructive and as a valuable lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2014, 08:12 PM
Rod P's Avatar
Rod P Rod P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ONROADYNO View Post
I thought C6 would have the best load carry capacity bearing.
the front bearing pack was designed to ease manufacturing(multi- vehicle use) and to take bearing preload adjustment problems out of assembly, of home builders and repair shops
__________________
Rod Prouty
My websiteAuto-cross 101
I'm not a Real Racer but I did spend a night in the Pozzi's motor-home
Bangshift Stories
I’m not the smartest guy at the track … but when he goes home … I’m still there testing, tuning, learning & getting faster.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net