Centerforce Dual Friction Clutch - Lateral-g Forums

Musclerodz · #1 12-09-2004, 04:41 PM

I need to buy a clutch and can't make up my mind. I posted this over at PT.com but got mixed results. For those that have ran them, what are your thoughts and would you run one again. Thanks in advance.

Mike

**camcojb** · #2 12-09-2004, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Musclerodz

I need to buy a clutch and can't make up my mind. I posted this over at PT.com but got mixed results. For those that have ran them, what are your thoughts and would you run one again. Thanks in advance.

Mike

Mike,

I've had extremely good luck with the Centerforce dual frictions. I've had them behind 600 HP in a couple of cars and Don has it behind his 691 rwhp Camaro. No problems at all. Now if it was a drag race application with slicks and boatloads of power I may go with a twin disc, but for some healthy street setups it works very well.

Jody

**XcYZ** · #3 12-09-2004, 05:49 PM

Mike, I used a CenterForce DF behind my 434 with the TKO. I thought it worked awesome. If I had to do it over again, I would buy the same clutch.

Some of the mixed reviews may have been coming from the late model guys. I've heard that CF isn't a good choice for 4th Gen F-bodys.

https://lateral-g.net/gulbranson/...terforcedf.jpg

Blown353 · #4 12-09-2004, 05:58 PM

I'm having extremely good luck with my Weber/Mcleod Dual Performance. It's similar to a Centerforce dual friction (organic material on the PP side, and bronze on the flywheel side) but without the little "finger" weights. Good smooth takeup, surprisingly light pedal effort, and I haven't felt it slip even under wide open throttle in 4th gear.

I've had a friend who had a couple of weights in his Centerforce DF let go, it wasn't pretty (little holes in his stock bellhousing.) That seems to be an exception though.

Also, you can't balance a Centerforce pressure plate because of the little weights, so you may or may not have a slight vibration.

If it's just a street car that won't be seeing any repeated slick usage at the strip, I'd recommend either. They both work very well for a high-HP street application.

Here's a pic of my Weber/McLeod setup, the disc is sitting metallic pad (flywheel side) up.

Troy

Musclerodz · #5 12-09-2004, 08:10 PM

The weights were a complaint over at PT.com. He said that the pedal engagemant postion was not the same at all rpms. Is this something that any of you have noticed? I am not fond of not being able to balance it if I can with a McLeod or the flyweight issue.

Mike

Blown353 · #6 12-09-2004, 09:03 PM

The pedal effort, not the take up position, will change with the RPM on a Centerforce with the weights. As you spin it faster, centrifugal force tries to pull the weights out, which puts more pressure on the fingers of the PP spring and more pressure against the pressure plate, increasing clamping power. Thus, the higher you rev it, the "stiffer" the clutch will feel since the weights will be exerting more force on the fingers.

It's weird at first but you get used to it quick.

As far as your last question/statement, yes you can balance a McLeod Dual Performance since the PP is a standard diaphragm type with no floating weights.

Troy