...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2013, 07:51 AM
barrrf's Avatar
barrrf barrrf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 303
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default A-Body Front Suspension Questions

Im finally able to start piecing together some suspension components after a great holiday. Im starting with the front and am not sure what my best choice would be as far as getting the car lower.......

I plan on purchasing Coil Overs next year. But right now Im either going to buy lowering springs or lowering spindles. Which option would be the best?

I was leaning towards 2" lowering tall spindles to achieve that camber sweetness as opposed to just tossing some springs in there on stock spindles. Does this make sense?
__________________
'69 Chevelle Malibu LSX370, 4L80E, Brembos, hydroboost, 12 bolt, c/os, etc.

You can call me Bart
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2013, 01:01 PM
barrrf's Avatar
barrrf barrrf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 303
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

After some hours of searching it looks like the best way to go would be with stock height tall spindles and lowering springs.

Thoughts?
__________________
'69 Chevelle Malibu LSX370, 4L80E, Brembos, hydroboost, 12 bolt, c/os, etc.

You can call me Bart
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2013, 04:02 PM
TMIProducts's Avatar
TMIProducts TMIProducts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrrf View Post
After some hours of searching it looks like the best way to go would be with stock height tall spindles and lowering springs.

Thoughts?
Maybe the lowering spring will give you more of a firmer/performance ride.

But if it were me, I'd do the drop spindle. That way you maintain the smoothness of the factory ride. Then do the tall ball joints to correct geometry.
__________________
www.tmiproducts.com

Our 66 Chevelle Build Thread:
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285211
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2013, 05:24 PM
marolf101x marolf101x is offline
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If you plan on going coil over in the future why not use a tall, drop spindle?
This will give you the drop you want, the added height will correct the geometry, and you'll have a head start on the coil over project (later you can just add upper and lower control arms with coil overs and be done).

The only thing you'll want to watch is that you don't reach ball joint bind using a tall spindle and the stock arms.

If you need to replace the OE shocks you can use our new RQ mono tube dampers that have a 1,000,001 mile warranty.

http://www.ridetech.com/store/muscle...hash=V270.V328
__________________
Skunk Werks
Ridetech
www.ridetech.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-05-2013, 02:18 PM
dug dug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marolf101x View Post
If you plan on going coil over in the future why not use a tall, drop spindle?
This will give you the drop you want, the added height will correct the geometry, and you'll have a head start on the coil over project (later you can just add upper and lower control arms with coil overs and be done).

The only thing you'll want to watch is that you don't reach ball joint bind using a tall spindle and the stock arms.

If you need to replace the OE shocks you can use our new RQ mono tube dampers that have a 1,000,001 mile warranty.

http://www.ridetech.com/store/muscle...hash=V270.V328

what he said.
__________________
Doug

1970 chevelle, 383/turbocharged/carb'd/5 speed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2013, 11:53 AM
barrrf's Avatar
barrrf barrrf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 303
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Actually, Im experiencing bind right now when in backing up at full crank. I assumed it was bad bearings. The problem is, work was done on the front end by the previous owner and I have no idea what components he used. I was just going to go ahead and replace the spindles in case the components used were of subpar quality.

Current shocks are those funky Edelbrock jobs. I dont know if I like them.

Could it be ball joints that Im feeling binding?
__________________
'69 Chevelle Malibu LSX370, 4L80E, Brembos, hydroboost, 12 bolt, c/os, etc.

You can call me Bart

Last edited by barrrf; 01-07-2013 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:06 PM
barrrf's Avatar
barrrf barrrf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 303
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marolf101x View Post
If you plan on going coil over in the future why not use a tall, drop spindle?
This will give you the drop you want, the added height will correct the geometry, and you'll have a head start on the coil over project (later you can just add upper and lower control arms with coil overs and be done).

The only thing you'll want to watch is that you don't reach ball joint bind using a tall spindle and the stock arms.

If you need to replace the OE shocks you can use our new RQ mono tube dampers that have a 1,000,001 mile warranty.

http://www.ridetech.com/store/muscle...hash=V270.V328
To verify, the RT website states the spindles are compatible with only aftermarket tubular control arms. True?
__________________
'69 Chevelle Malibu LSX370, 4L80E, Brembos, hydroboost, 12 bolt, c/os, etc.

You can call me Bart
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2013, 02:49 PM
black67malibu black67malibu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've been speaking with the guys from SC&C about my 67 chevelle. I was talking with a guy named Marcus and he gave me some great info for my car. Might be worth a phone call.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2013, 05:46 PM
exwestracer's Avatar
exwestracer exwestracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'd look closely at which method will keep the lower arms closest to level (ball joint to mounting bolt) at your desired ride height. IMO, that will give you the best starting point for getting the rest of the geometry correct.
__________________
Ray Kaufman-Wyotech chassis fab instructor
Custom suspension design and consultation.
(Now 2) Big Block asphalt supermodified ('cause too much is never enough...)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2013, 06:42 PM
marolf101x marolf101x is offline
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ray is correct, you want your lower control arm parallel with the ground.
Let's say you have that with the current setup. . .nice thing about a "tall, drop" spindle is the lower arm stays exactly where it is, but the car is a couple of inches lower and the upper arm is now angled up so it increases camber in a turn, which aids handling. (if your lower arm is not parallel with the ground we have other things to look at).

The reason we state these spindles should only be used with tubular arms is that we cannot ensure there is no ball joint bind with the OE arm (if you install our entire "kit" we know where everything is). I would try them out, but make sure you don't reach ball joint bind as this is a major issue.

If you have bind you can pick up the upper control arms as well, which will resolve the problem (as we change the ball joint angles). It will take a little more out of your wallet at the moment, but you'll be closer to that coil over setup you really want anyway.
__________________
Skunk Werks
Ridetech
www.ridetech.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net