poor handling on highway

[montanass]

so i'm getting tired of chasing my car around going down the highway. It seems to jump from one side of the rut(s) to the other, making it quite a handfull and takes away from the fun of driving.

My setup is:

69 el camino
BBC- 2" lowering springs, stock spindles, 18x8 front rims 255/40R18 (f)- 18x10 295/35R18 Rear

all hotchkis components, sway bars, lower conrtol arms (rear) edelbrock adjustable upper control (rear), etc.

I'm just wondering if this is common with larger wheels and low pro tires, or if i should start looking into this a little deeper.

thanks

[Vince@Meanstreets]

a bit more info needed;

alignment specs?
brand of tires being used?
steering linkage new or old? worn components
steering box new or old? worn components
tire pressure?
what speed?
front suspension new or old? worn components

[sweetstang68347]

A couple of thing that come to mind are the amount of caster in alignment and bump steer. But yeah...

Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab

a bit more info needed;

alignment specs?
brand of tires being used?
steering linkage new or old? worn components
steering box new or old? worn components
tire pressure?
what speed?
front suspension new or old? worn components

[montanass]

Tires are toyo t1r, 28 psi, alignment is set to "factory specs" (had it done at les Schwab). Steering components are factory origional. I have a poly bushing kit in the plans, and tubular upper and lower control arms. I've been waiting to do the bushing kit until I get the control arms since I'd have to do those bushings anyway. Also a quick ratio steering box is in the plan book... However since a new house and other things are taking up most of my fun money I have to be patient.

[Bryce]

Dont quote me on this. But weren't the factory specs set up for bias ply tires. I know the 65 falcon mustang specs were for bias ply tires.

What are the factory specs. I bet you have very little caster, (the reason you bought the tubular control arms was to increase positive caster). I would also guess you have positive camber. You want the tire to be in at the top, that would be negative camber.

[wmhjr]

There's your problem. Factory specs are worthless once you've changed geometry using different spindles, ball joints, upper and lower control arms. You've changed your entire front geometry and need to align accounting for it.

[wmhjr]

Originally Posted by montanass

I'm just wondering if this is common with larger wheels and low pro tires, or if i should start looking into this a little deeper.

thanks

No, it is not common.

[Hotchkis]

Originally Posted by montanass

so i'm getting tired of chasing my car around going down the highway. It seems to jump from one side of the rut(s) to the other, making it quite a handfull and takes away from the fun of driving.

My setup is:

69 el camino
BBC- 2" lowering springs, stock spindles, 18x8 front rims 255/40R18 (f)- 18x10 295/35R18 Rear

all hotchkis components, sway bars, lower conrtol arms (rear) edelbrock adjustable upper control (rear), etc.

I'm just wondering if this is common with larger wheels and low pro tires, or if i should start looking into this a little deeper.

thanks

Montanass – it sounds like there must be something worn out or loose in the front suspension components. Check all the ball joints, tie rod ends, idler arm, pitman arm, and steering box. Your car should not be wandering that much if the alignment is good.