...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2006, 09:53 PM
cam69 cam69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default horse power rating on stock LT1

does anybody know the HP of an LT1, and max HP it can handle stock before hurting something.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2006, 10:24 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

N/A or forced industion? I used to run a 8# blower on my 94 LT1 making 415 rwhp and never blew it up, but I'd say that was alot for the stock bottom end. Weakest link were the stock pistons which would blow up with too much boost or N20, also opti's were a weak point. The 95+ had a vented unit which was supposed to be a better design.

93-95 F-body LT1's were 275 hp
96-97 F-body LT1's were 285 hp
96-97 Ram Air/SS LT1's were 305 hp
92-96 Vette LT1's were 300 hp
96 LT4's were 330 hp

lots of info on: www.camaroz28.com
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2006, 11:08 PM
cam69 cam69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar
N/A or forced industion? I used to run a 8# blower on my 94 LT1 making 415 rwhp and never blew it up, but I'd say that was alot for the stock bottom end. Weakest link were the stock pistons which would blow up with too much boost or N20, also opti's were a weak point. The 95+ had a vented unit which was supposed to be a better design.

93-95 F-body LT1's were 275 hp
96-97 F-body LT1's were 285 hp
96-97 Ram Air/SS LT1's were 305 hp
92-96 Vette LT1's were 300 hp
96 LT4's were 330 hp

lots of info on: www.camaroz28.com
asking becuse i have a new LT1 that was given to me today,and was wondering if it was worth the effert to install in my 69 convertible with a turbo setup.im not planing on drag racing or dogging the car.i just want to cruse it and the setup to look nice under the hood.thanks on the info ,would like to know your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2006, 05:51 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I woudn't twin turbo the stock LT1 bottom end, it won't last very long, unless it's running low boost (6 psi) You can get good power from it NA if you install a good set of heads, cam and run a coil per cyl. setup like the LS1. Plus you'll need a good tune.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-23-2006, 04:03 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You don't need the coil per cylinder stuff,The new MSD opti solved all the opti problems,A stock LT1 bottemend is good to about 450/ 475 hp.There good engines,I have stroked Lt1 in my 94 Z and it makes good power.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2006, 06:47 AM
Chevy350 Chevy350 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oslo in Norway/North Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Also visit www.impalassforum.com, they have lots of good info on getting the LT1's reliable in big, heavy cars.
__________________
Thanks, Christian (@v8power.net)
'77 Chevy Caprice
'71 Chevy Nomad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net