...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: Which one would you choose and why?
Alterkation front with Lateral Dynamics rear (does not use panhard bar) 12 60.00%
XV Level II front with XV Level II rear (does use panhard bar) 8 40.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:00 AM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver69Camaro
I differ from this opinion. A well-designed panhard bar can work extremely well, and does not suffer from the usual drawbacks of a watts (complexity, cost, weight, and exhaust room).
in your case i can see why youŽd object.. but or your chassis (AM) the roll-center in the rear is so well controlled and low set with the rear UCAŽs mounted where they are.. but when upgrading anything on a car my philposophy has always been to get it as good in the first go as is possible...

and the point of exhaust room on a cuda -that with a fair degree of certainty will have exhaust exiting before the rear wheels... isnt a sure seller.
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net