First Gen Camaro Subframe Feedback...

[68protouring454]

Originally Posted by BRIAN

There is no clear choice to any of the options. The stock subframe has been proven to be a viable option with the correct mods. It can also offer adjustability with the the ATS and SC&C stuff.


The full clips add a one stop shopping complete bolt on with some compromises. You have to remember almost no 2 builds are the same so there has to be a compromise made unless it is built specific for your exact set up. That is where the adjustable set ups come into play. Problem is how many guys have the equipment or knowledge to make adjustments. Ever try to get an alignment shop to make adjustments to a modified car?

Everybody has a different idea of what handles well and what good ride and tire wear are. The person describing the handling and ride might drive a F150 or an BMW M3 so they have a different opinion as to what is good. Look for good customer service and a proven design. I do not want to be the test for someone to develop their parts. DSE has the edge in my opinion on design and testing. Plus their parts have a lot of miles on them.

Jake I have never seen your set up but if you are offering a tailored to fit bolt on you might have a market. I have never seen anybody offer a fully set up roller as an option to their suspension which if you did I think would help with that small shop personal attention sale. Just an idea. The cost of buying several spring sets and set up tools would be about the same cost.

I wish someone would design a coil over that lasts 15k miles without leaking and springs that do not sag. That is why I would favor a modified stock design. Killer delrin style bushings and 5" springs with adjusters with conventional shocks. I hate crawling under a car when they are done to keep fiddling with it. I would rather be driving.

thats why we use chose bilstein shocks and hyperco springs exclusively.no problems with leaking, or breakage.