...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 01-17-2006, 04:29 PM
Musclerodz's Avatar
Musclerodz Musclerodz is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: washington, ok
Posts: 4,286
Thanks: 22
Thanked 164 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1969LS1
Maybe you could explain the advantage of a PHR over the triangulated upper links?

Also, why would a PHR be more advantageous than a Watt's link?

Knowledge is power
Triangulated upper links are a version of the satchell link rear. The angled links should preferably be below the rear for several reasons. One, with the angled links on top, they are usually very short and will bind with very little movement. if they are on bottom they are much longer and less likely to bind. You can cure some of the bind with the use of Jonny Joints. the second reason I have been told is with the angled links on bottom, it lowers roll center height but not sure why. Dennis or Marcus can answer that.

Panhard Bars are better for packaging around exhaust systems. Watt's links are better centering devices for the rear in that they don't allow the rear to move side to side at all. Panhards with enough travel move in a an arc which is side movement. Disadvantage of Watt's is getting the exhaust out the rear effectively. Hope this helps and if I am wrong on anything please correct me. I am a young grass hopper still in training.

Mike
__________________
Mike Redpath
Musclerodz & Customz
facebook page
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net