...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old 12-23-2004, 02:11 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Jody is right; the 307 frame mounts are wider and taller, and use a wider and thinner motor mount. All the other engines used narrower and shorter frame mounts with narrower and taller motor mounts. The taller engine mounts will absorb a little more vibration since they have more isolation material.

FYI, based on my measurements of factory pieces, the 307 frame pads and engine mounts will lower the engine in the car by about 3/16" compared to the 350/all other engine mounts. I run the 307 stuff myself, mostly because my car was originally a 307 car and I didn't feel like swapping the mounts on the frame. Added bonus that it lowers the engine a bit!

Troy
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net