...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2011, 06:05 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Matt, I'd have to agree with Todd. I think the kits are priced similarily anyways just the DSE Q-link might be a bit more labour to install.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2011, 06:30 PM
Ron in SoCal's Avatar
Ron in SoCal Ron in SoCal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Only thing I'd add - and I'm not 100% positive on this - but I believe you can get better A/S numbers w the G link as opposed to the Q link if you plan on drag racing?
__________________
Ron in SoCal
69 Camaro in progress
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2011, 08:25 PM
6D9 Matt's Avatar
6D9 Matt 6D9 Matt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
Matt, I'd have to agree with Todd. I think the kits are priced similarily anyways just the DSE Q-link might be a bit more labour to install.
Well I know the G-link and Q-link are similar, but I believe the Prodigy G-bar is about $200-300 cheaper. I will probably just stay screw it and go DSE... when you are spending that much, what is an extra couple hundred?
__________________
'69 Camaro
416ci / T56 / 9"
Turbo in the works...

Last edited by 6D9 Matt; 11-09-2011 at 08:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2011, 09:20 PM
BBC71Nova BBC71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Sounds like your intended usage is pretty much inline with mine. I went back and forth with this decision myself and I ended up going G-link. No seat time yet but for multi-purpose setup I think it will work out nicely and has a good bit of adjustability.

The QuadraLink is awesome piece and especially so if you plan any serious auto-X/road race outings. As stated, the labor to install could make it more expensive than the other options. That's another reason I decided against it.

I'd recommend giving Marcus at SC&C a call and discuss it with him. Very helpful in understanding the pros/cons of the popular choices, e.g. G-link, Air Bar/Prodigy Bar, torque arm, QuadraLink.
__________________
John
'71 Nova (Build thread)
FFR Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:29 AM
dhutton dhutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mountain Springs, Texas
Posts: 1,922
Thanks: 1,174
Thanked 535 Times in 293 Posts
Default

Take a look at the four bar setup from Art Morrison. Looks like less fab than the Quadralink but doesn't use the factory frame rails. I had a G-Bar in my Firebird and I'm definitely going to consider AME on my next F body.

Don
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net