...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2013, 06:21 PM
ProTouring442's Avatar
ProTouring442 ProTouring442 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Harriman, TN
Posts: 1,331
Thanks: 19
Thanked 37 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RS-Chris View Post


I have a question... and please excuse me if it sounds dumb. Would it make sense to make the frame run all the way out to the rocker panels, and then weld the assembly together instead of a more narrow frame like in this picture?

Thanks!
Bill
__________________
Never met a man with real talent who felt the need to deride the efforts of other.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2013, 08:21 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProTouring442 View Post
I have a question... and please excuse me if it sounds dumb. Would it make sense to make the frame run all the way out to the rocker panels, and then weld the assembly together instead of a more narrow frame like in this picture?

Thanks!
Bill
Bill, our 2nd Gen chassis is normally built that way. This customer wanted to try to retain as much of the original floor as possible and wasn't interested in a low stance. So we did a chassis for this car that basically ran back as an extension of the sub-frame. It will still be much stronger than a subframe and connectors, and more than enough for the intentions of this car.

Here is a pic of our standard 2nd gen chassis


And the standard stance


__________________
www.roadstershop.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2013, 11:02 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadster Shop View Post
Bill, our 2nd Gen chassis is normally built that way. This customer wanted to try to retain as much of the original floor as possible and wasn't interested in a low stance. So we did a chassis for this car that basically ran back as an extension of the sub-frame. It will still be much stronger than a subframe and connectors, and more than enough for the intentions of this car.

Here is a pic of our standard 2nd gen chassis


And the standard stance


Hopefully you will get to finish that one some day.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2013, 04:12 AM
ProTouring442's Avatar
ProTouring442 ProTouring442 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Harriman, TN
Posts: 1,331
Thanks: 19
Thanked 37 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadster Shop View Post
Bill, our 2nd Gen chassis is normally built that way. This customer wanted to try to retain as much of the original floor as possible and wasn't interested in a low stance. So we did a chassis for this car that basically ran back as an extension of the sub-frame. It will still be much stronger than a subframe and connectors, and more than enough for the intentions of this car.
Sweet! One day...

Thanks!
__________________
Never met a man with real talent who felt the need to deride the efforts of other.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net