...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-15-2007, 02:20 AM
tyoneal's Avatar
tyoneal tyoneal is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
Here you go... www.heacockclassic.com

I talked with Gary Gandy there.. He's the underwriting manager. Tell him I said hello. lol

The most annoying thing about ALL collector car insurance companies is the "you can't drive it to work" deal.. ever.. Heacock seemed pretty good though.

Frank from Prodigy uses them and seems very happy.
==============================================
Steve:

Thanks a million for the contact information. I contacted them on their web page, and will phone them on Monday. Since you use them, and our cars are somewhat similiar. (Yours of Course is much more polished and refined) I think these folks might be the right people for me to work with as well.

If anything pops up with them about Penny, please PM me and I'll do the same. I am pretty certain that the value of this car will be fairly high when I am (Technically) done with it.

Thanks again for your input.

Regards,

Ty
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-15-2007, 04:23 AM
jackreggers jackreggers is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

For what it’s worth, I’ll share my experience after going through a complete insurance adjustment on the daily drivers and two Camaros over the last few months. Here’s the scenario – I live in Florida, have 5 cars and four drivers in the household. Household drivers include my wife, daughter (21) and son (18) and me. The cars are a 04 Honda Pilot, 04 Mustang GT, 99 Jeep Cherokee, 69 Camaro ($48K appraisal) and 67 Camaro ($52K appraisal). I previously had all the cars with ANPAC with coverage at 250/500 level for each. Both Camaros cost about $750 a year with stated value under their Chrome coverage (no nitrous, no racing, under 7500 mi/yr, locked garage). History wise, we had no problems with ANPAC service to include an accident with one of the daily drivers that was 100% the other drivers fault. Since I'm over 50 and an AARP member, I took at look at the old guy rates through Hartford. I was surprised to find that the annual Hartford estimate for the three drivers was about 1/2 the annual ANPAC rate for the same coverage. However, the Camaro coverage’s were way, way higher and there were a lot more restrictions. So my plan was to move the daily drivers to Hartford and keep the two Camaros with ANPAC. No so fast. The ANPAC rules require you to have a daily driver on the policy to get their Chrome Class rate. They grandfathered me for my current policy term but the new term rates got my immediate attention. The premium for the two Camaros under the ANPAC policy went up to about $4K a year for exactly the same coverage I previously had for $750. The reason was that without a daily driver, ANPAC tags one of the Camaros as a daily driver and the rate skyrocketed. After many Q&A sessions with very helpful ANPAC and Hartford reps (as well as looking at the other classic car insurance companies) I ended up insuring two of the drivers with Hartford and one driver and the two Camaros with ANPAC. This may not be the ideal solution, but it was the best I could come up with. The overall result is (starting tomorrow) I have the same coverage as I previously had, the two Camaros went back to their old rate (~$750K/year for both - stated value) and it reduced my total annual premium for all five cars by about 45% over what I paid last year. FYI, the ANPAC stated value is defined as actual cash value, amount to repair or replace or amount shown on the declaration. I realize that stated value is not ideal for the Camaros but the ANPAC requirements more closely match how I really use them. Also, both policies cover all four drivers in the house so my son can drive the Camaros without worry (insurance ones anyway). Should something catastrophic happen to the Camaros, I know I’m in for a ride. But, I’ll go forward armed with photos (hundreds for each from day one) and receipts for everything (even the ones my wife doesn’t see) and hope for the best. Hope, of course, wasn’t a word I noticed in any of the policy language.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-15-2007, 11:13 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,182
Thanks: 6,512
Thanked 1,985 Times in 898 Posts
Default

thanks for the info Jack. Stated value can be the only option for those who daily driver their classics, and as long as a guy knows what he's got for coverage it works well. The problem is many people with State Farm, Allstate, etc. think they have an agreed value policy and are guaranteed of a dollar amount in a full loss, and that is simply not true. The ACV (Actual Cash Value) part of the policy tells you it is stated, not agreed. How do they determine ACV? By finding comparable cars to yours and seeing what they're selling for. The value on your stated policy is the most they'll pay, not the guaranteed amount like an agreed policy.

I always want people to know the difference and then make a decision on what's best for them.

Good first post and welcome to the site!

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank

Last edited by camcojb; 07-15-2007 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-15-2007, 12:08 PM
jackreggers jackreggers is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Jody. As you mentioned, the important thing is to know what you have. Like me, I suspect a lot of folks don't want to go through the mental anguish of planning for the worst and then hearing the insurance they thought met their need provides something less than what they think is either right or fair. One thing for sure is that the paperwork is definately confusing and often contradictory. For example, one of ANPACs form letters defines stated value for the Chrome class as "In the event of a total loss to your specialty vehicle, ANPAC will pay you the amount shown on your policy, less deductable." I really liked that definition until I received a different letter, signed by the same person and dated two days later, that provides the the other definition for stated value (lesser of ACV, the amount to repair/replace or the amount in declaration). Nowhere does the term Agreed Value appear. Phone discussions with their rep to clarify the point (she was great by the way) made it pretty clear that the second definition that favors the insurance company is the more accurate one. Anyway, it works for me since neither of the Camaros are used for daily transporatation but I do drive the 69 Camaro every chance I get to nearby cruise ins and shows. By the way, the Chrome info letter says it has a 10,000 annual mileage allowance but the policy paperwork I got yesterday (the one that counts I suppose) says 7500. Last year's mileage really started adding up after I hit a few out of town shows, an Orlando visit to Old Town Kissimmee and a few legs of the Powertour. I think I did about 6500 so I'm still in the comfort zone.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net