...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-20-2008, 05:54 PM
chevyIIpost's Avatar
chevyIIpost chevyIIpost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Doom summed it all Up. Big Dittos. GM are you listening????????????? Retro will sell not tonka.
__________________
Ted Rea
"Don't drive FASTER than your guardian angel can fly"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-20-2008, 06:24 PM
Doug Harden Doug Harden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow....you'd have thought that on a site that embodies handling and power, people wouldn't get so excited about an overweight, bloated, un-original version of a great car....



The New Dodge Challenger

Wheelbase, in.: 116.0
Overall Length, in.: 197.7
Overall Width, in.: 75.7
Overall Height, in.: 57.0
Curb Weight, estimated, lbs.: 4140

New new Camaro will hand this car it's @$$ at every track you want to try....at a better price too.

Last edited by Doug Harden; 03-20-2008 at 06:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-20-2008, 08:26 PM
Dodgenut64 Dodgenut64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes, the new challenger is hefty. Thats ashame, it takes the srt8 (6.1) hemi in the big challenger to out run the 300hp 4.6 mustang. If they could have made it weigh the same as the mustang and new camaro, the challenger would eat the new camaro fairly enough. However, just like back in the day, the challenger is coming in heavier then the other pony cars, only this time heavier. Chrysler should have just used the small A bodies for autocross racing back then.
Maybe if it sells well, they can build a new challenger on a smaller platform? Still, It will be cool to see the run down in Motor Trend. You gotta at least give them credit for finally giving Mopar guys a 2 door, rearwheel drive, v8 car. All we had was the dakota for a looooong time.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:43 AM
Karps TA Karps TA is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Muskego, WI
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Harden View Post
Wow....you'd have thought that on a site that embodies handling and power, people wouldn't get so excited about an overweight, bloated, un-original version of a great car....
From the reviews I've seen the new Challenger has plenty of power and has pretty good handling. And more then anything it actually looks good doing it. Which is something the new Camaro, whenever it finally actually hits the road, doesn't have. Sure it's overweight. Everything is nowadays. A Solstice weighs 3000#.
__________________
1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-25-2008, 04:11 PM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by steemin View Post
I know that I am going to hurt the feelings of some of the Camaro guys..
But I like new Challenger a lot more than the new Camaro.
Probably because the Challenger is more true to the original design...
Scott
I agree there!! AND,... I'm a Chevy guy!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-03-2008, 06:29 PM
PASD U PASD U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Another vote for the other guys. All the latest photos I've seen of the Camaro suggest to me that Chevy missed the mark. The Chally and Crustang look good though. Can't wait to see an SRT8 dressed up in some nice wheels and lowered suspension.

Oh well, still praying we're blessed with a CTS-V coupe!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-04-2008, 04:58 PM
G-Body's Avatar
G-Body G-Body is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

All signs show the new Camaro being over 4,000 lbs thats not light and ='s well not alot of performance without a biggg motor
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-05-2008, 01:39 PM
Dodgenut64 Dodgenut64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, that is challengers weight. I thought the new camaro was supposed to be closer to mustang weight? I guess the camaro, with its IRS just couldnt get that low in wieght. Looks like pricing vs engine power is gonna be the big battle between the Camaro and Challenger. The 5.7 hemi for 2009 has 385hp and 404 lbs, what is the 5.7 ls1 pushing out these days?
Looks like the mustang will beat the Dodge and Chevy in the wallet and 1/4 mile, I wonder if they will out handle the stang........
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-06-2008, 12:40 PM
crazycarl's Avatar
crazycarl crazycarl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Citrus Heights, CA
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It shouldn't be that difficult for the Camaro and Challenger to outhandle the Mustang in stock trim. The Fords handle like dogs from the factory.
__________________
I'm probably just screwing with you, so please don't take it personal.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-06-2008, 01:23 PM
sacarguy sacarguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default ya its true especialy in size

have you guys actualy seen one of these up close ?

I have its HUGE almost the size of a ford explorern and it weighs in over 4 THOUSAND pounds

it sits a good 4-5 inches taller then a 03 ford cobra and is at leaast 8 inches longer

its actualy bigger then the original


here is a good comaprison to a sn-95 mustang < wich is no small car >

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hN5wFZ_iebU&feature=related

the 2010 mustang is going to have 400 horsepower also so ford wins the stop light war since its the lightest of the three at 3600 vs 3800 for the maro and 4100 for the dodge

Last edited by sacarguy; 04-06-2008 at 01:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net