...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:25 AM
DDY RCKT's Avatar
DDY RCKT DDY RCKT is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 286
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

One of the problems I see with 3-piece wheels is the hardware. Those bolts all along the outer rim do not work with all designs. What you have is a mix of fantastic designs for centers that work great with a shallow lip, some with a deep lip, some with the hardware, and some without. I don't see enough provisions for making the hardware more subtle, personally. Flush mounted hardware, shallow heads, etc. On some wheels, the big bolts work wonders. I love the way they look on my GM Prototype wheels. But a lot of the time they just look bad. Id say if there were more choices on how that hardware looked, the 3-piece wheel would be more popular.

That's just my opinion, though.
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:49 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DDY RCKT View Post
One of the problems I see with 3-piece wheels is the hardware. Those bolts all along the outer rim do not work with all designs. What you have is a mix of fantastic designs for centers that work great with a shallow lip, some with a deep lip, some with the hardware, and some without. I don't see enough provisions for making the hardware more subtle, personally. Flush mounted hardware, shallow heads, etc. On some wheels, the big bolts work wonders. I love the way they look on my GM Prototype wheels. But a lot of the time they just look bad. Id say if there were more choices on how that hardware looked, the 3-piece wheel would be more popular.

That's just my opinion, though.
Ditto, probably the main reason we are not looking at any three piece stuff is because of the hardware. My Dad does not like that look, plus he hates the prospect of keeping the areas around that hardware clean. If you are driving the car the area around these fasteners will collect dirt. Anyway, if that hardware could be done differently it may open up the market.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2008, 09:18 AM
jsr69's Avatar
jsr69 jsr69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 82
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Chris

PM with a price for some 18 x 12 and 18 x 9's in the FS905, 906, & 907.

I've gotten pricing on billet and other 3-piece wheels and agree that the 12" wheel is the same price. The cost savings for the initial purchase of the billet wheel comes in with narrower wheel that doesn't have to be widened. With that being said, I concur with all the advantages that you and others have stated.

I'm still a while out before needing wheels, but the more I think about it, the more I'm leaning towards 3-piece.

Let me know.

Thanks
__________________
Steve Spoor
69 Rally Sport with Quadra-Link, Wayne Due C-4 Subframe, T-56, 420 SB2.2

67 Chevelle, Art Morrison Chassis, 416 LS3, T-56 (under construction)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net