...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 03-03-2009, 09:51 AM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,156
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver69Camaro View Post
Just curious, why not use a program like WinGEO? Solidworks can be very cumbersome for assemblies like that.
I use Solidworks because I have it and can turn the design in Soildworks into plates to machine out to make different crossmembers for suspension. I realize that there are better programs for suspension, but it all boils down to numbers. I don't need the program to tell me what the instant center is, I know the point where the upper and lower control arms intersect is the instant center and solidworks well tell me that number.


There were guys haulin ass with kick ass suspensions that they drew on the floor with chaulk. Todays modern suspensions have just be refined to the point that they test and tested. Computers just make that easier and quicker. You still have to be 2% smarter then the program your using.
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 03-03-2009, 09:55 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironworks View Post
There were guys haulin ass with kick ass suspensions that they drew on the floor with chaulk. Todays modern suspensions have just be refined to the point that they test and tested. Computers just make that easier and quicker. You still have to be 2% smarter then the program your using.
I still have a piece chalk in the tool box! Don't forget the string! You hit the nail on the head, it is just quicker. 2% smarter, I quit!

Later,
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 03-03-2009, 10:37 AM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,156
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccracin View Post
The initial base for this thread was to try and answer some of these questions or at least give folks some legitimate targets. Alot of guys can choose alot of parts and put them together, but have no idea what the end target should look like. I think we are turning on some light bulbs with regard to this stuff.

Your complete post just gave alot of information that I guarantee guys that spent thousands of dollars on parts never even considered.

My head hurts too, literally I'm still sick! Crap.

Thanks for jumping in Roger, your thoughts are well respected around here.
As far as respected, I don't know about that, we are just lucky and might have common sense which is not so common any more.


I have a 1946 Packard that a customer brought in a while ago that we are going to have to build a complete custom suspension for. No C6 stuff with trans axles, just a 5.3liter LS engine with 4L60E. It will have updated rear leaf springs in the rear. But the front suspension is almost impossible to get parts for and who would want to use it any ways, the steering in those days did not return to center and and was not built to do much over 55mph, maybe. I have looked at using the stock pick up points and build new control arms to those since we lowered the ride height the geometry would be Descent. But the crossmember curves forward to clear the old straight 8 flat head engine. Now I started with the tires he wants to run ( Caddy wire wheels) which have a 28" diameter in the front with the tires. But the wheels only come in a 5 on 5" bolt pattern. So that limits the avalible spindle and brake options real quick. Wilwood had a 13 kit with 5 on 5" pattern with their Pro spindle but those would not clear or even work with a 15" wire. So
I got a set of 98 chevy truck spindles for 100 bucks from the junk yard. They have 5 on 5" pattern stock. I'm working on figuring on the ride height of the chassis and will set the spinldes at the spindle height of the desired tires at the rough track width I'm looking for. Then I will set up the rack at the height the spindle's steering arms. I will then figure out a good upper control arm length and ratio to the bottom to optimise bumpsteer with the standard 24" center AGR rack.

I'm not trying to make a super corner carver Packard, but there is no front suspension kit on the market that I found that will suit my needs so we will build it. Same theory just not as high tech I suppose.

take it for what it's worth, probably not much

Rodger
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 03-03-2009, 12:13 PM
chevyIIpost's Avatar
chevyIIpost chevyIIpost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Cool! Thanxs guys for the input. How about some plus or minus ranges for general guidelines in the street performance range.

Camber gain per inch..................

Static caster..................

Roll center height.................

Bump steer................

Ackerman.............

Anti dive %..................

How about some software recommendations?

Where do you guys source specs from for stock components?

Which stock components do you like to work with? I will assume C5/C6 as one option that works well?

Which after market components or sources do you guys like? (ARG, Maval/Unisteer, Stock car products)?

Who is will to do consulting work in this area for a fee?
__________________
Ted Rea
"Don't drive FASTER than your guardian angel can fly"

Last edited by chevyIIpost; 03-04-2009 at 11:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 03-10-2009, 12:23 AM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Numbers?

John
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 03-10-2009, 04:37 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by novanutcase View Post
Numbers?

John
I second the motion! I'm finally free from the bug that held me down and am trying to do some work on this. But, what I think the numbers should be are not what people want. Where are you suspension guru guys? Please don't stop the enlightenment!
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 03-10-2009, 09:41 AM
novanutcase's Avatar
novanutcase novanutcase is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccracin View Post
I second the motion! I'm finally free from the bug that held me down and am trying to do some work on this. But, what I think the numbers should be are not what people want. Where are you suspension guru guys? Please don't stop the enlightenment!
YEAH! Don't stop!

We're still trying to take the pebble from your hand!



John
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 03-10-2009, 10:19 AM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'd love to provide a "general" list of specs, but I can't really. I have to do that on a case-by-case basis.

You could say the specifications I listed previously works for vehicles similar to a well-prepared first-gen Camaro. I wouldn't stick it on a Chevelle or a '55 Chev if you wanted the best of performance. But honestly, you could put it on most vehicles and just swap springs and ARBs to match the new vehicle.
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net