Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick Mc
So Bill
Everyone was building crap, you proved that, and GM has lost market share since 1980, I showed that in my graph.
Then what was GM's down fall?
I think GM has been making better quality cars since OBDII, 1996, and you have been buying domestic cars and putting thousands of miles on them.
So why was GM's market share decreasing, when we know the overall market was growing and GM even owned the finance company to get people financed?
What was GM's down fall?
Just because a news guy says something is not going to drive market share down.
Even JD Powers rates domestic cars as good quality in fit finish and reliability etc.
What was GM's down fall?
Mick
|
The market share argument looks good on the surface, but upon closer inspection it falls apart. In 1960 you had the following market in the US:
GM
Cadillac
Buick
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Chevrolet
GMC
Ford
Lincoln
Mercury
Edsel
Ford
Crhrysler
Imperial
Chrysler
DeSoto
Dodge
Plymouth
Other
Rambler
Studebaker
Metropolitan
Checker
Imports
Volkswagen
Mercedes Benz
Porsche
Triumph
MG
Jaguar
Today you have:
GM
Cadillac
Hummer
Buick
Pontiac
Chevrolet
Saturn
GMC
Ford
Lincoln
Mercury
Ford
Chrysler
Chrysler
Dodge
Jeep
Toyota
Lexus
Toyota
Scion
Nissan
Infinity
Nissan
Honda
Acura
Honda
Other American
None
Other Import
BMW
Mercedes Benz
Mini
Jaguar
Mazda
Kia
Hyundai
Audi
Volvo
Saab
Land Rover
Porsche
Subaru
While a few of these are niche vehicles, we still have quite a few more mainstream manufacturers in the marketplace, and thus a smaller marketshare.
The media is certainly part of the problem as they have a history of covering the American auto industry with a definite bias. Examples? The Pinto which, as it turns out, had just about the same rate of people dieing in fires as pretty much any other car. So why did we get so many stories about the Pinto back in the 70's? Then there are the GM pickups that "burst into flames." Only they didn't, and so the media faked it. Of course there was the Corvair...
Now, couple the above with the fact that only the "Big Three" has had to contend with the persistent and onerous Auto Unions and their increasingly unrealistic contracts, the US Automakers found themselves in an untenable position.
Could GM have fought these contracts? Sure, but to what end? The media nearly always sided with the unions when it came to their coverage so the negative press was massive, and the losses sustained in attempting to counter the unions was phenomenal. In one two month strike in the early 70's GM lost over 40 BILLION in sales revenue!
So what killed GM? See the above! These factors helped create a situation wherein the profit per car was simply too small. Think about it, in 1957 Oldsmobile managed to be profitable selling only 384,000 cars while in 1995 their fate was being sealed by a lack of profit, while selling 372,000 cars. Worse, there is a greater number of shared components in the 1995 cars which should have lead to increased profitability.
Shiny Side Up!
Bill