...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2009, 12:42 PM
mrr1999's Avatar
mrr1999 mrr1999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Stock sub frame question (1st gen)

Hey guys. Does anybody know the weight of a bare stock sub-frame in a 1st gen Camaro? Thanks.
__________________
Mike - Las Vegas, NV
69 Camaro - in process
70 Chevelle SS396
69 Mach I
Yes...Chevys and Fords
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2009, 06:54 PM
XLexusTech XLexusTech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 86
Thanked 119 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Page 3 of the iron works 67 Chris Alston build thread
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2009, 08:23 PM
almcbri's Avatar
almcbri almcbri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 982
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...t=21125&page=3

261 lbs.
__________________
1968 Camaro LS1/T56, Hotchkis Springs, Tubular Arms, AFCO sway bar, C5 brakes, VWW 18" V40's http://s14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...1968%20Camaro/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2009, 10:37 PM
mrr1999's Avatar
mrr1999 mrr1999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks so much.
__________________
Mike - Las Vegas, NV
69 Camaro - in process
70 Chevelle SS396
69 Mach I
Yes...Chevys and Fords
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-12-2009, 10:53 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

There are no substantial weight advantages to any subframe swap.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-12-2009, 11:01 PM
mrr1999's Avatar
mrr1999 mrr1999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I was just wondering if I was going to be able to move it around once I take it out to re-weld it and sand blast it.
__________________
Mike - Las Vegas, NV
69 Camaro - in process
70 Chevelle SS396
69 Mach I
Yes...Chevys and Fords
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2009, 11:18 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

If you need help, shoot me an email. I'd run down to harbor freight and grab a couple rollers for cheap so it's easy to move around and put back in.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2009, 11:25 PM
mrr1999's Avatar
mrr1999 mrr1999 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, Todd. I appreciate it.
__________________
Mike - Las Vegas, NV
69 Camaro - in process
70 Chevelle SS396
69 Mach I
Yes...Chevys and Fords
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2009, 02:27 AM
Sundance Sundance is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almcbri View Post
A bare, no A-arms or engine mounts sub frame is no were near 261 lbs. Either that or the time at the gym has paid off...

Maybe 150-170. I pick mine up and move it around by myself all the time, it's more awkward (balance) then heavy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2009, 08:52 AM
Jar's Avatar
Jar Jar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I read someplace that a bare stock sub is about 110 lbs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net