...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-21-2009, 05:29 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I think I would split the $$ to ship penny over there to see the Stig run the course.. that would be too cool.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-21-2009, 05:31 PM
LowchevyII's Avatar
LowchevyII LowchevyII is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 440
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

lets start a donation to ship penny over there. i would love to see the stig drive that beast
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-21-2009, 05:31 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skooli View Post
I would love to see pro-touring style muscle cars on Top Gear just to see how Jeremy Clarkson reacts to their performance. He has called American made cars "rubbish" because they don't handle as well as Ferraris or other over priced "super cars". But what he'll see is that we can build and modify our relatively in-expensive cars in our own garages for a fraction of what it costs to buy an over built European sports car. He'll still probably call them rubbish. Somebody needs to send Rupp and Bad Penny to England to kick some Porsche/BMW/ Ferrari a$$.
And yet he owns a Ford GT...
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-21-2009, 06:10 PM
Greg from Aus's Avatar
Greg from Aus Greg from Aus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 808
Thanks: 87
Thanked 20 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Don't get to upset about not having a Knock of version of the show, we have one over here in Aus and it is CRAPPPP. As has been said it's the quirkiness of the presenters that works, not that easy to duplicate. Our ones just come across as try hards.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-21-2009, 06:43 PM
Jr's Avatar
Jr Jr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: so cal
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
And yet he owns a Ford GT...
I think he sold the Ford GT.

Clarkson did love the zr1 corvette.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:00 PM
Matt@BOS's Avatar
Matt@BOS Matt@BOS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 2
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

Ok, I had a scary realization when I went to the Aston Martin dealership to get the paint code for our car. I was walking past a line of v8 vantages and realized my dad and I could have split one and been on the road for roughly the same amount as we have into our Camaro, which isn't quite finished. When its done, it could probably hang with the little Aston, provided we're not driving Still, the point I'm trying to make is that when you add up all the time time invested, into a price that accurately reflects the hours, by and large, pro-touring cars aren't necessarily cheaper. I'm guessing Jackass cost a bit more that a ZR1, and isn't quite as fast around a track. I'd love to see those two cars run though.

I suppose the point I'm trying to make in regard to the over-priced, over-engineered Euro car comment is that, while expensive, if you were to build a car that was just as well engineered it would probably cost more. BTW when I say build I'm assuming that a majority of the build will be done by a shop.

I think we need SW's opinion here.

BTW, I'll contribute to the Bad Penny shipping fund just because I'm a bit of a topgear geek.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:12 PM
skooli's Avatar
skooli skooli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69MSA View Post
...I suppose the point I'm trying to make in regard to the over-priced, over-engineered Euro car comment is that, while expensive, if you were to build a car that was just as well engineered it would probably cost more. BTW when I say build I'm assuming that a majority of the build will be done by a shop...

Matt
This example is a bit extreme, but this Mustang kind of supports my point that classic American Muscle is a little more fun because we can modify and work on our own cars.

http://www.pro-touring.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38420

And how about Liz Miles' Camaro? I bet she hasn't spent the price of a high end European sports car to make her car a fun corner carver.
__________________
Brad

67 Camaro
383/ 700r4

57 F100
289 / C4
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:28 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69MSA View Post
Ok, I had a scary realization when I went to the Aston Martin dealership to get the paint code for our car. I was walking past a line of v8 vantages and realized my dad and I could have split one and been on the road for roughly the same amount as we have into our Camaro, which isn't quite finished. When its done, it could probably hang with the little Aston, provided we're not driving Still, the point I'm trying to make is that when you add up all the time time invested, into a price that accurately reflects the hours, by and large, pro-touring cars aren't necessarily cheaper. I'm guessing Jackass cost a bit more that a ZR1, and isn't quite as fast around a track. I'd love to see those two cars run though.

I suppose the point I'm trying to make in regard to the over-priced, over-engineered Euro car comment is that, while expensive, if you were to build a car that was just as well engineered it would probably cost more. BTW when I say build I'm assuming that a majority of the build will be done by a shop.

I think we need SW's opinion here.

BTW, I'll contribute to the Bad Penny shipping fund just because I'm a bit of a topgear geek.

Matt
But having the car isn't the point.. it's the journey.

It's also the challenge. I could have bought a ZR1 but how tough is that? Making a 40 year old hunk of metal get down isn't easy and that's what makes it fun. Easy is over rated.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-21-2009, 09:28 PM
Matt@BOS's Avatar
Matt@BOS Matt@BOS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 2
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

I was trying to play a little bit of the devil's advocate there. I mean I've got relatives that just don't understand the hobby at all (don't we all?), and their typical response is, why didn't you just go out and get a vette, or a porsche?

Now, I totally agree with what both of you guys are saying. I think I even alluded to that in my last post. I wouldn't be doing what I am otherwise. I don't think idea of buying an exotic car ever crossed my mind, or ever will cross my mind. I've never been a fan of just throwing money down and driving off. In fact, come next year when our project is done, I know both my dad and I will greatly miss the whole process of the build, might even have to get something else in a couple years...

and Skooli, I'm not quite sure what you're getting at in relation to what I said. Maybe because I should have explained things a bit better myself. When I was writing that, I had cars like the G-Force 'Cuda, Roadster shop's 'Vette or, well... all of the Ring Brothers work in mind. The top Gear guys criticize American cars not only for poor handling, but lack of "refinement," and in my mind the cars they would compare that stack up against exotics, through and through, probably cost more than a comparable factory produced car.

I do agree that it's possible to build something as fast or faster for much less though. I think Ron's Mustang definitely proves that.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-21-2009, 09:56 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Two completely different trips. When your pro touring car is done, you have a one off. That's why it costs so much. Building them is one thing, making them perform and reliable is a whole new ballgame once the build is through. You really need both in my opinion.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net