...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2009, 09:09 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobG View Post
Anyone?
Just assume that it's fair to say - the latest model versions can handle 550 hp... Since that's what the CTS-V engine is rated at.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2009, 11:10 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Just assume that it's fair to say - the latest model versions can handle 550 hp... Since that's what the CTS-V engine is rated at.
That's a good estimate. It might go 600 na as the CTS-V is supercharged.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2009, 11:27 AM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Just assume that it's fair to say - the latest model versions can handle 550 hp... Since that's what the CTS-V engine is rated at.
I was curious for comparisons sake. If Mark Stielow put this unit in to support a ZR1 powerplant and that's 630hp I'm wondering what it's good up to. Seems like a sweet deal regardless.

Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2009, 09:23 PM
Garage Dog 65 Garage Dog 65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 1,207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Sorry Rob - you wouldn't believe how difficult it is to get info on new parts from GM ... I spent an entire day looking and calling for info with no luck.

I called the AC Delco tech assistance line. That is contracted out by GM to a company that performs tech work for many of the OEMs including Porsche lambo, etc. They could answer my spec info request on the part - but I would need to setup an account first - then it would cost $3.25 for each question - and $3.25 per minute for them to answer the question.

So unless Mark can provide the info from the inside - or a member with access to the info can add it - I'll have to setup an account and pay.

GM # 19207950 and ACD # M10235

I have also tried to get the name of the supply vendor for the venturi jet component used in the early C5 Fuel Sender/Jet Pump unit - but no one will give that out as it's still proprietary.... been making those since what 1998 ? So I have bought a couple used assy's off e-bay for $20 bucks and will piece meal the setup together.

Man I'm spoiled from aviation ... the supply vendor's name is right there next to the part number in the illustrated parts catalog - WITH their address and phone number.

Rant off...

__________________
My Project: 65 Porsche 356G

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=5109
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2009, 08:48 AM
RobG RobG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garage Dog 65 View Post
Sorry Rob - you wouldn't believe how difficult it is to get info on new parts from GM ... I spent an entire day looking and calling for info with no luck.

I called the AC Delco tech assistance line. That is contracted out by GM to a company that performs tech work for many of the OEMs including Porsche lambo, etc. They could answer my spec info request on the part - but I would need to setup an account first - then it would cost $3.25 for each question - and $3.25 per minute for them to answer the question.

So unless Mark can provide the info from the inside - or a member with access to the info can add it - I'll have to setup an account and pay.

GM # 19207950 and ACD # M10235

I have also tried to get the name of the supply vendor for the venturi jet component used in the early C5 Fuel Sender/Jet Pump unit - but no one will give that out as it's still proprietary.... been making those since what 1998 ? So I have bought a couple used assy's off e-bay for $20 bucks and will piece meal the setup together.

Man I'm spoiled from aviation ... the supply vendor's name is right there next to the part number in the illustrated parts catalog - WITH their address and phone number.

Rant off...

I appreciate the effort but no need to pay those yahoo's for a simple answer, that's a joke. Like I said earlier I would just like some specs for comparisons sake because I am a big fan of using factory stuff in my hot rods because they are usually a lot more durable and a lot easier to get (replacements) than aftermarket.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2009, 09:05 AM
steinepstein steinepstein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I found a few items on "fuel surge" tanks that most of the STI and Honda guys are running. This is basically a high/low pressure system with a very small tank for the FI pump. This looks like a potential solution to the problem without having to build two separate tanks, just place inline and use a low pressure pump to feed from the main tank. Here are a couple links:

http://www.ratdat.com/?p=168

http://sdsefi.com/techsurge.htm

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2009, 09:15 AM
steinepstein steinepstein is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok, welp, I read the piece about the surge tank from Stielow, ok back to drawing board.


JE
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2010, 11:00 AM
PhillipM PhillipM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I appoligize for bringing back this old thread, but I was wanting to see if any headway was made on this subject?

Phillip
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-04-2010, 03:14 AM
frojoe's Avatar
frojoe frojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 296
Thanks: 17
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by steinepstein View Post
Ok, welp, I read the piece about the surge tank from Stielow, ok back to drawing board.


JE
I was thinking of doing this as well, but back to Stielow... I agree that a pump that isn't moving any fuel is not being cooled or lubricated, but in this picture below, the low-pressure, high-volume rear pump is always flowing good volume, and the the high-pressure low volume FI pump at the front is doing what it would otherwise be doing if it were just sucking gas from the regular tank and sending it all the way forward to the engine. Maybe throw cooling fins on the surge tank or a cooler on the return from the FPR, and another cooler on return from surge -> main tank... where would heating and lubrication issues come from? I'm in 4th year of mechanical so feel free to explain all "engineery like' if need be!

Thanks,
Joe

....

__________________
Joe
1972 Nova with twin 6466's and T56 Magnum in the works. Speedtech, Ridetech, Wilwoods etc. Swap thread --> http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=980909


Last edited by frojoe; 09-04-2010 at 12:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net