...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:30 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,620
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 923 Times in 687 Posts
Default

How timely this post is. I was wondering around dreaming about what I want to do with my TA when I have time. I'm poor right now and the cost of the DSE Qlink is hard for me to envision I would accept. So I was thinking I'd just build my own 4 link when the time comes. Only problem I was having was is the swivel link rods found in the Qlink that good? If not what rod ends would I use, rod or JJ? Now I know. I still wonder if the Qlink is really that good or can you still do great without the swivel links?

Thanks for the education guys
__________________
Trey

Current ride: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped.

Former rides: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-03-2009, 07:45 PM
The WidowMaker's Avatar
The WidowMaker The WidowMaker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 773
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

ballistic fab just replaced their lower qa1 line with the midwest control stuff. if it was for sway bar end links its one thing, but for critical suspension points i wouldnt want to be the guinea pig.

i used jj's for mine after listening to mark explain why they were so much better. if you saw one you would understand why they are so damn strong.
__________________
"The WidowMaker"
70 Chevelle Pro Touring - Garage Built, Backyard Painted
Custom 4 Link & Watts, Rushforth Wheels, Ats Spindles, McLeod RXT Twin Clutch, T56 Magnum, C6Z Calipers & Ring Bros Hinges
Special Thanks To: Rushforth Wheels ; Kore3 ; SC&C
Build Thread : https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...ght=widowmaker
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-04-2009, 09:35 AM
mfain mfain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 453
Thanks: 76
Thanked 108 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Here is some technical information from the QA1 site that you might find useful. The first link describes how a rod end's ultimate static load is computed -- it is the lowest of three areas: race material compression strength, rod end head strength, or shank strength. The second link provides a cross-reference of various QA1 rod ends to other manufacturers (Aurora, Spherco, etc) which might be useful when comparing prices.

http://www.qa1.net/qa1_industrial/ra...ad_ratings.pdf
http://www.qa1.net/qa1_industrial/part_interchange.html

I have attached a shot of my garage-built 4-link for an independant suspension. It uses a C-4 Corvette upright with Woodward swedged tubes and Aurora rod ends (3/4 in.).
Attached Images
 

Last edited by mfain; 12-04-2009 at 09:50 AM. Reason: Correction - accuracy
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-04-2009, 10:42 AM
Teetoe_Jones Teetoe_Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: La La Land, CA
Posts: 856
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfain View Post

I have attached a shot of my garage-built 4-link for an independant suspension. It uses a C-4 Corvette upright with Woodward swedged tubes and Aurora rod ends (3/4 in.).
Pappy-

You need to start a build thread of the 'Vette. People here would flip out on it. Hope all is well in Lost Wages!

Tyler
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-04-2009, 08:19 PM
JRouche JRouche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ventura County
Posts: 253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfain View Post
Here is some technical information from the QA1 site that you might find useful.

I have attached a shot of my garage-built 4-link for an independant suspension. It uses a C-4 Corvette upright with Woodward swedged tubes and Aurora rod ends (3/4 in.)


Nice info, thanks!! And very clean, SOLID suspension. Thats a very professional job you did. Id love to see a build thread also.. You have some very nice work.. JR
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-04-2009, 09:38 PM
T_Raven's Avatar
T_Raven T_Raven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Idaho Falls, Id
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the good info guys. I've always heard heim joints need to be replaced every couple years and were bad for nvh but I never knew the jj had better longevity and less nvh. Can any one explain the differences between them or point me to a good website?

Edit: Never mind, I found them on Currie's website lol. I never knew there was urethane in a johnny joint, pretty cool design. There's a video on Currie's site http://www.currieenterprises.com/ces...nnyjoints.aspx
__________________
67, 68, 69 & 72 Firebirds, 79 TA, 89 GTA, 01 WS6, 68 Camaro, 68 Mustang, 54 GMC awd turbo, 67 GMC

Last edited by T_Raven; 12-04-2009 at 09:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net