...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-10-2009, 01:52 PM
73CPCAMARO's Avatar
73CPCAMARO 73CPCAMARO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjarky View Post
Man, that thing will be killer! Giant roller skate. I assume you will have to flare the front fenders and not run inners?


The front fenders will need to be flared more in the up direction. I am going to try to keep the fenders as stock looking as possible. We have not put the fenders on yet to see how big they will need to be. Nothing will be on the inside. The fenders are fiberglass.

__________________
Brian Hobaugh

1965 Corvette
1973 Camaro
2003 Z06

Last edited by 73CPCAMARO; 12-10-2009 at 05:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-12-2009, 11:31 AM
73CPCAMARO's Avatar
73CPCAMARO 73CPCAMARO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Here are some updated shots of the front structure.



__________________
Brian Hobaugh

1965 Corvette
1973 Camaro
2003 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12-12-2009, 01:41 PM
rlplive rlplive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MO
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, I am completely in awe of this car. Nice work. Man I want to race!
__________________
1969 Camaro. Peeling paint, rust, the whole works.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12-12-2009, 01:58 PM
Lemons Lemons is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Brian,

The car is looking absolutely killer. It's gonna look wicked with all that tire underneath it. I like the route you have taken with the suspension. I have thought about doing something similar with my 73.

Good luck, I can't wait to see more.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12-16-2009, 03:42 PM
Desert68 Desert68 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The two pieces of blue tape in the bottom picture. Could you please explain the setup with the steel plate and then the tubing running forward? The plate is attached to the firewall and the tubing is attached to the subframe? I'm having a little trouble picturing it in my mind and my 2nd gen is stored a distance from my home. Incredible build. Things such as the spindle fabrication is just jaw dropping impressive to me.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-16-2009, 06:23 PM
73CPCAMARO's Avatar
73CPCAMARO 73CPCAMARO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert68 View Post
The two pieces of blue tape in the bottom picture. Could you please explain the setup with the steel plate and then the tubing running forward? The plate is attached to the firewall and the tubing is attached to the subframe? I'm having a little trouble picturing it in my mind and my 2nd gen is stored a distance from my home. Incredible build. Things such as the spindle fabrication is just jaw dropping impressive to me.
Thanks for the nice words. Here is a photo from the inside. Hopefully, this will answer your question. Maier is buidling the cage to make the car as rigid as possible. The plate is just covering up the hole in the firewall.



__________________
Brian Hobaugh

1965 Corvette
1973 Camaro
2003 Z06

Last edited by 73CPCAMARO; 12-16-2009 at 09:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12-16-2009, 06:50 PM
G-Body's Avatar
G-Body G-Body is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Oh my now this is a project wow i loveeeeeeeee it awesome fab work
What a balls to the wall build
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12-16-2009, 07:06 PM
byndbad914's Avatar
byndbad914 byndbad914 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 73CPCAMARO View Post
The square tubing is used in the rear section for a few reasons. It is more rigid than round tubing for tension and compression. If it does fail, it is at a higher rate than round tubing.
Who on Earth told you that? I am not saying it is bad to use square tubing, but what you just stated is based on something other than engineering... generally speaking a square is one of the worst shapes, hence why you see a lot of round columns for compression members like bridges across the nation and engineers use words like "triangulate" - make sure to make every square a triangle at some point. Not too many square submarines out there

There are certainly reasons to use square tubing and you did state one of them in terms of easy to attach panels to by having a flat surface to rivet into and riveting the panels in and really making them carry shear adds a lot of rigidity. Also people have learned that after you bend a tube it removes the rigidity it so it is better to cut and weld the corner than bend it making sq tubing easier to work with that way as well.

That said, dig the car and am definitely subscribed!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-16-2009, 07:37 PM
73CPCAMARO's Avatar
73CPCAMARO 73CPCAMARO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I am not a mechanical engineer, so I am not a great source to debate the strength differences. I am going with the knowledge and expertise of my builder.
__________________
Brian Hobaugh

1965 Corvette
1973 Camaro
2003 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 12-16-2009, 07:38 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,620
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 924 Times in 687 Posts
Default

In pure tension or pure compression, a square tube should have a higher load capacity than round because there's more metal in the cross sectional area if the diameter and width match. ie 2in square tube has more are than 2in round. Obviously, wall thickness would need to be the same as well.

That's simply sigma = force/area. How is that not right? Are there other forces at play possibly? From my knowledge as that of a mech eng student, round is used primarily because it has the same characteristics regardless of which direction the force is applied ie it's the same on all "sides". A rectangle or square depends on where the force is applied or how the tube is oriented.

Where am I messing up?
__________________
Trey

Current ride: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped.

Former rides: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net