9 sec pt cars - Page 7 - Lateral-g Forums

speedjohnston · #61 02-10-2010, 05:24 PM

I am trying and finally getting somewhere, but its been costly and I want to try and stay married. lol
I will post on here when I am ready. I was hoping for some testing in mid summer so October may work out.

Junkie · #62 02-10-2010, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speedjohnston

I am trying and finally getting somewhere, but its been costly and I want to try and stay married. lol
I will post on here when I am ready. I was hoping for some testing in mid summer so October may work out.

Looking forward to seeing it run. If you ever come through DFW and need some help with something just let me know

speedjohnston · #63 02-10-2010, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junkie

Looking forward to seeing it run. If you ever come through DFW and need some help with something just let me know

Will do! Thanks.

6D9 · #64 02-10-2010, 09:47 PM

Vinny's car is the sh*t! I love how the car can do anything with a simple tire/wheel change. Seems like the airride is the most versitile set up for drag/handling car. Has my wheels turning now.....

jjarky · #65 02-10-2010, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chr2002ca

I was going to mention Project Splitter as well. I believe Brett did get it into the 9's on the dragstrip(using a different set of front and rear tires) but I don't recall seeing him ever road racing or autocrossing it as it was also designed to do. If I remember correctly, I believe the weight(4100+lbs) might have kept it from being effective in road racing. Maybe the new owner made some mods. Who knows. The lumpy carbureted large displacement big block might cause some people to argue about it being 'pro-touring', but it seems like a pro-touring car to me, and it did run 9's with a tire swap.

I agree with "The lumpy carbureted large displacement big block might cause some people to argue about it being 'pro-touring". Exactly what I was thinking. It sounded nasty when it was staging in the video. Don't think that would be very user friendly from stop light to stop light in 90 degree heat. Last thing we need is another "what is pro-touring" debate, but I would think "in traffic" driveability would have to be a must.

Junkie · #66 02-10-2010, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjarky

I agree with "The lumpy carbureted large displacement big block might cause some people to argue about it being 'pro-touring". Exactly what I was thinking. It sounded nasty when it was staging in the video. Don't think that would be very user friendly from stop light to stop light in 90 degree heat. Last thing we need is another "what is pro-touring" debate, but I would think "in traffic" driveability would have to be a must.

Lots of ppl daily drive BBC combination's. Yes i agree that an LSx is more officiant but in some situations its just not optimum. Ive had several really powerful build LS's but in an old school car trying to make big power a BBC would probably be ideal. i wonder what the weight difference is on a all Alum BBC combo vs. an iron blocked LS. For an 800hp build its hard to beat a nice built LS3

legend · #67 02-11-2010, 06:42 AM

220 mph is very fast for something as brick like as big red, what power were they running? I'd also be worried about 40 yr old aerodynamics at those speeds

something like a mclaren F1 does the top speed side of things but stuggles to do 11s in standard trim IIRC,

**GregWeld** · #68 02-11-2010, 06:51 AM

If it was easy --- the fat chicks could do it!

Thus my point at the very beginning of this thread... but this thread has been hijacked WAY AWAY from the OP....

**GregWeld** · #69 02-11-2010, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjarky

I agree with "The lumpy carbureted large displacement big block might cause some people to argue about it being 'pro-touring". Exactly what I was thinking. It sounded nasty when it was staging in the video. Don't think that would be very user friendly from stop light to stop light in 90 degree heat. Last thing we need is another "what is pro-touring" debate, but I would think "in traffic" driveability would have to be a must.

I would "think" that in "drag race trim" -- such as shown in the video of Vinnies car -- the HEADERS are uncorked... and in that trim with drag radials on it turned in a 9.98 qtr....

BUT (BIG BUT) to me THAT ENDS the argument for PT -- because PT would use the tires that they went to the grocery store in AND have the stereo on -- and the exhaust system intact.

**GregWeld** · #70 02-11-2010, 07:01 AM

I forgot my "point" I was going to make in the above post ---- That this same car (Vinnies) with the exhaust hooked up --- and "street tires" wouldn't get close to a 9.98 and might even be a full second slower.... with bad 60ft times - and less top end charge... So the OP might be debatable as I seriously doubt the ability to run "9's" in true PT trim.

Now this should start some good debate!! Pulling the pin on the grenade.... "in coming!!"